Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Fluid-structure instability forecasts thoracic aortic aneurysm progression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.10030 v2 pith:LYOR3ZK4 submitted 2021-11-19 physics.med-ph physics.bio-ph

Fluid-structure instability forecasts thoracic aortic aneurysm progression

classification physics.med-ph physics.bio-ph
keywords aneurysmaorticgrowthaneurysmsdimensionlessinstabilitynumberthreshold
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The basic mechanism driving aneurysm growth is unknown. Currently, clinical diagnosis of an aneurysm is mainly informed by retrospective tracking of its size and growth rate. However, aneurysms can rupture before reactive criteria are met or remain stable when they are exceeded. Here, we identify a fluid-structure instability that is associated with abnormal aortic dilatation. Our analysis yields a measurable dimensionless number and its analytically derived critical threshold. This threshold pinpoints the transition from stable flow to unstable aortic fluttering as a function of the physiological properties composing the dimensionless number, like blood pressure and aortic compliance. A retrospective study was then conducted with 4D-flow MRI data from 117 patients indicated for cardiac imaging and 100 healthy volunteers recruited prospectively. The difference between the dimensionless number and its critical threshold was calculated for every subject from their earliest MRI data and used as an aneurysm physiomarker to forecast future growth. As a binary predictor for abnormal growth and subsequent surgical intervention reported from follow-up imaging, the aneurysm physiomarker yielded an AUC of 0.997 in a receiving operator characteristic analysis. Though validated here for thoracic ascending aortic aneurysms, this instability mechanism may be used to understand, predict and inform patient-specific treatment of aneurysms in any location without fundamental differences.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.