Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Federated Learning with Domain Generalization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.10487 v2 pith:A3PYJ3AG submitted 2021-11-20 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords domainslearningclientsdomainfedadgfederatedsourcedata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Federated Learning (FL) enables a group of clients to jointly train a machine learning model with the help of a centralized server. Clients do not need to submit their local data to the server during training, and hence the local training data of clients is protected. In FL, distributed clients collect their local data independently, so the dataset of each client may naturally form a distinct source domain. In practice, the model trained over multiple source domains may have poor generalization performance on unseen target domains. To address this issue, we propose FedADG to equip federated learning with domain generalization capability. FedADG employs the federated adversarial learning approach to measure and align the distributions among different source domains via matching each distribution to a reference distribution. The reference distribution is adaptively generated (by accommodating all source domains) to minimize the domain shift distance during alignment. In FedADG, the alignment is fine-grained since each class is aligned independently. In this way, the learned feature representation is supposed to be universal, so it can generalize well on the unseen domains. Intensive experiments on various datasets demonstrate that FedADG has comparable performance with the state-of-the-art.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Shift Happens - Confounding Is to Blame

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under hidden confounding shifts, predictive information reduces to conditional informativeness minus a residual, a result the authors use to explain ERM's surprising OOD competitiveness and the value of all-covariate models.

  2. Optimal Transport-based Domain Alignment as a Preprocessing Step for Federated Learning

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Wasserstein barycenter-based color alignment is claimed to boost FedAvg's CIFAR-10 accuracy from ~71% to ~99%, but the evaluation is questionable.

  3. Unified Alignment Protocol: Making Sense of the Unlabeled Data in New Domains

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    UAP, an alternating two-stage training protocol, improves unseen-domain accuracy in semi-supervised federated learning by aligning client and server features to a Gaussian distribution defined by the classifier weights.

Pith tools