Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Accelerating Deep Learning with Dynamic Data Pruning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.12621 v1 pith:EV66MXJK submitted 2021-11-24 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords trainingpruningdynamicsamplesdatatimeworkalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning's success has been attributed to the training of large, overparameterized models on massive amounts of data. As this trend continues, model training has become prohibitively costly, requiring access to powerful computing systems to train state-of-the-art networks. A large body of research has been devoted to addressing the cost per iteration of training through various model compression techniques like pruning and quantization. Less effort has been spent targeting the number of iterations. Previous work, such as forget scores and GraNd/EL2N scores, address this problem by identifying important samples within a full dataset and pruning the remaining samples, thereby reducing the iterations per epoch. Though these methods decrease the training time, they use expensive static scoring algorithms prior to training. When accounting for the scoring mechanism, the total run time is often increased. In this work, we address this shortcoming with dynamic data pruning algorithms. Surprisingly, we find that uniform random dynamic pruning can outperform the prior work at aggressive pruning rates. We attribute this to the existence of "sometimes" samples -- points that are important to the learned decision boundary only some of the training time. To better exploit the subtlety of sometimes samples, we propose two algorithms, based on reinforcement learning techniques, to dynamically prune samples and achieve even higher accuracy than the random dynamic method. We test all our methods against a full-dataset baseline and the prior work on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, and we can reduce the training time by up to 2x without significant performance loss. Our results suggest that data pruning should be understood as a dynamic process that is closely tied to a model's training trajectory, instead of a static step based solely on the dataset alone.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Implicit Flatness Bias of Sharpness-Aware Minimization: A Linear Stability Analysis with Quantitative Hyperparameter Bounds

    cs.LG 2026-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    SAM's largest Hessian eigenvalue is bounded by the cube root of bGamma/(2*rho*eta^2), so larger radius, smaller batch, or larger learning rate restrict linearly stable minima to flatter regions.

  2. OPERA: Online Data Pruning for Efficient Retrieval Model Adaptation

    cs.IR 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dynamic hierarchical data pruning improves NDCG@10 and Recall@20 for dense retrievers while reaching full performance in half the iterations.

  3. Differential-informed Sample Selection Accelerates Multimodal Contrastive Learning

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DISSect selects training samples for multimodal contrastive learning by ranking the difference between historical and current model similarity scores, matching full-data performance with 70% fewer samples.

  4. Partial Forward Blocking: A Novel Data Pruning Paradigm for Lossless Training Acceleration

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PFB prunes training samples based on the probability density of their shallow-layer features, blocking pruned samples from deep-layer forward and backward passes, and reports lossless or better accuracy with up to 33%...

  5. RL-Selector: Reinforcement Learning-Guided Data Selection via Redundancy Assessment

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    RL-Selector uses an A2C reinforcement learning agent, rewarded by an epsilon-sample cover score, to pick training subsets that improve accuracy and cut training cost.

  6. Multimodal-Guided Dynamic Dataset Pruning for Robust and Efficient Data-Centric Learning

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A dynamic pruning method scores each sample by combining task loss with CLIP image-text similarity and selects samples near the median score each epoch.

Pith tools