Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Towards a Secure and Reliable IT-Ecosystem in Seaports

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Tobias Brandt, Dieter Hutter, Christian Maeder, Rainer Müller

Cryptography and Security · Submitted 26 Nov 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Security mechanisms are presented to satisfy the resulting requirements, which together with the guarantees of all individual actors will guarantee the security of the overall workflow.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2111.13436 (version 2)
Pith IDOXMISGM4, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationChristian Maeder, Dieter Hutter, Rainer M\"uller, Tobias Brandt. "Towards a Secure and Reliable IT-Ecosystem in Seaports." arXiv:2111.13436 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/OXMISGM4
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,697 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.05 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.02 · compares with prior results 0.04 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Digitalization in seaports dovetails the IT infrastructure of various actors (e.g., shipping companies, terminals, customs, port authorities) to process complex workflows for shipping containers. The security of these workflows relies not only on the security of each individual actor but actors must also provide additional guarantees to other actors like, for instance, respecting obligations related to received data or checking the integrity of workflows observed so far. This paper analyses global security requirements (e.g., accountability, confidentiality) of the workflows and decomposes them - according to the way workflow data is stored and distributed - into requirements and obligations for the individual actors. Security mechanisms are presented to satisfy the resulting requirements, which together with the guarantees of all individual actors will guarantee the security of the overall workflow.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Digitalization in seaports dovetails the IT infrastructure of various actors (e.g., shipping companies, terminals, customs, port authorities) to process complex workflows for shipping containers. background 1.00 0.08 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 The security of these workflows relies not only on the security of each individual actor but actors must also provide additional guarantees to other actors like, for instance, respecting obligations related to received data or checking the integrity of workflows observed so far. background 0.98 0.13 0.08 asserted 1.00
s2 This paper analyses global security requirements (e.g., accountability, confidentiality) of the workflows and decomposes them - according to the way workflow data is stored and distributed - into requirements and obligations for the individual actors. contribution 0.73 0.92 0.10 asserted 1.00
s3 Security mechanisms are presented to satisfy the resulting requirements, which together with the guarantees of all individual actors will guarantee the security of the overall workflow. contribution 0.83 0.86 0.65 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.79 · evidence from argument 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Digitalization in seaports dovetails the IT infrastructure of various actors (e.g., shipping companies, terminals, customs, port authorities) to process complex workflows for shipping containers. The security of these workflows relies not only on the security of each individual actor but actors must also provide additional guarantees to other actors like, for instance, respecting obligations related to received data or checking the integrity of workflows observed so far. This paper analyses global security requirements (e.g., accountability, confidentiality) of the workflows and decomposes them - according to the way workflow data is stored and distributed - into requirements and obligations for the individual actors. Security mechanisms are presented to satisfy the resulting requirements, which together with the guarantees of all individual actors will guarantee the security of the overall workflow.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.