Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Building Trustworthy Machine Learning Models for Astronomy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.14566 v1 pith:BBOCDNNT submitted 2021-11-29 astro-ph.IM

Building Trustworthy Machine Learning Models for Astronomy

classification astro-ph.IM
keywords astronomybuildinglearningmachinetrustcommunitymethodsmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Astronomy is entering an era of data-driven discovery, due in part to modern machine learning (ML) techniques enabling powerful new ways to interpret observations. This shift in our scientific approach requires us to consider whether we can trust the black box. Here, we overview methods for an often-overlooked step in the development of ML models: building community trust in the algorithms. Trust is an essential ingredient not just for creating more robust data analysis techniques, but also for building confidence within the astronomy community to embrace machine learning methods and results.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Interpretable machine learning of halo gas density profiles: a sensitivity analysis of cosmological hydrodynamical simulations

    astro-ph.GA 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    Random forests reproduce simulated halo gas density profiles to roughly 80-90% accuracy, and Sobol analysis of those forests ranks halo mass and central gas mass as the dominant predictors across EAGLE, IllustrisTNG, ...