Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Unity is Strength: A Formalization of Cross-Domain Maximal Extractable Value

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.01472 v2 pith:XV2EPE5C submitted 2021-12-02 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords extractablevaluecross-domainmaximalworkdomainsacrossanother
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The multi-chain future is upon us. Modular architectures are coming to maturity across the ecosystem to scale bandwidth and throughput of cryptocurrency. One example of such is the Ethereum modular architecture, with its beacon chain, its execution chain, its Layer 2s, and soon its shards. These can all be thought as separate blockchains, heavily inter-connected with one another, and together forming an ecosystem. In this work, we call each of these interconnected blockchains "domains", and study the manifestation of Maximal Extractable Value (MEV, a generalization of "Miner Extractable Value") across them. In other words, we investigate whether there exists extractable value that depends on the ordering of transactions in two or more domains jointly. We first recall the definitions of Extractable and Maximal Extractable Value, before introducing a definition of Cross-Domain Maximal Extractable Value. We find that Cross-Domain MEV can be used to measure the incentive for transaction sequencers in different domains to collude with one another, and study the scenarios in which there exists such an incentive. We end the work with a list of negative externalities that might arise from cross-domain MEV extraction and lay out several open questions. We note that the formalism in this work is a work in progress, and we hope that it can serve as the basis for formal analysis tools in the style of those presented in Clockwork Finance, as well as for discussion on how to mitigate the upcoming negative externalities of substantial cross-domain MEV.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. There Will Be Spam: Characterizing State-Invariant Transactions and Speculative MEV

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    State-invariant transactions are ~2.6% of Ethereum but 24–37% of Optimism/Base traffic; speculative MEV dominates L2 spam yet is often unprofitable after failed-attempt fees, and address poisoning is half of Ethereum’...

  2. Optimistic MEV in Ethereum Layer 2s: Why Blockspace Is Always in Demand

    cs.CE 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Optimistic MEV, mostly non-trading cyclic arbitrage probes, accounts for 51% of on-chain gas on Base and 55% on Optimism in Q1 2025, versus 7% on Arbitrum.

  3. Blockspace Under Pressure: An Analysis of Spam MEV on High-Throughput Blockchains

    cs.GT 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Equilibrium spam-MEV volume on high-throughput chains is derived in closed form as a function of block capacity, minimum gas price, and fee ordering, and is tested on Base and Arbitrum data.

  4. Measuring CEX-DEX Extracted Value and Searcher Profitability: The Darkest of the MEV Dark Forest

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CEX-DEX arbitrage on Ethereum extracted an estimated 233.8M USD in 19 months, increasingly concentrated among three searchers tied to dominant block builders.

Pith tools