Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Radiative decay of the $\Xi_c(2923)$ in a hadronic molecule picture

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 8 Dec 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We find that decay width $\Xi_c(2923)^0\to\Xi_c^0\gamma$ and $\Xi_c(2923)^0\to\Xi_c^{'0}\gamma$ is evaluated to be approximately 1.23-11.66 KeV and 0.30-3.71 KeV, respectively.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2112.04130 (version 1)
Pith IDVR3KXSYJ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationFeng Yang, Hong Qiang Zhu, Yin Huang. "Radiative decay of the $\Xi_c(2923)$ in a hadronic molecule picture." arXiv:2112.04130 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/VR3KXSYJ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,680 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.46 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.17 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.98 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In the present work, we study the radiative decay of newly observed $\Xi_c(2923)^0$ based on the successful explanation that $\Xi_c(2923)^0$ is an $S$-wave $D\Lambda-D\Sigma$ molecular state in our previous study~\cite{Zhu:2020jke}. The radiative decay width of $D\Lambda-D\Sigma$ molecular state into $\Xi_c^0\gamma$ final state through hadronic loops are evaluated using effective Lagrangians. We find that decay width $\Xi_c(2923)^0\to\Xi_c^0\gamma$ and $\Xi_c(2923)^0\to\Xi_c^{'0}\gamma$ is evaluated to be approximately 1.23-11.66 KeV and 0.30-3.71 KeV, respectively. These are different from the results~\cite{Wang:2020gkn,Bijker:2020tns} that obtained by assuming $\Xi_c(2923)^0$ may be conventional charmed baryon. If measurements are in future experimental, these differences will be very useful to help us to test various interpretations of $\Xi_c(2923)^0$.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In the present work, we study the radiative decay of newly observed $\Xi_c(2923)^0$ based on the successful explanation that $\Xi_c(2923)^0$ is an $S$-wave $D\Lambda-D\Sigma$ molecular state in our previous study~\cite{Zhu:2020jke}. contribution 0.86 0.54 0.06 asserted 0.97
s1 The radiative decay width of $D\Lambda-D\Sigma$ molecular state into $\Xi_c^0\gamma$ final state through hadronic loops are evaluated using effective Lagrangians. method 0.98 0.90 0.05 asserted 0.99
s2 We find that decay width $\Xi_c(2923)^0\to\Xi_c^0\gamma$ and $\Xi_c(2923)^0\to\Xi_c^{'0}\gamma$ is evaluated to be approximately 1.23-11.66 KeV and 0.30-3.71 KeV, respectively. result 1.00 0.97 0.78 asserted 1.00
s3 These are different from the results~\cite{Wang:2020gkn,Bijker:2020tns} that obtained by assuming $\Xi_c(2923)^0$ may be conventional charmed baryon. interpretation 0.70 0.16 0.11 asserted 0.97
s4 If measurements are in future experimental, these differences will be very useful to help us to test various interpretations of $\Xi_c(2923)^0$. interpretation 0.58 0.13 0.10 hedged possibility 0.82

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.53.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In the present work, we study the radiative decay of newly observed $\Xi_c(2923)^0$ based on the successful explanation that $\Xi_c(2923)^0$ is an $S$-wave $D\Lambda-D\Sigma$ molecular state in our previous study~\cite{Zhu:2020jke}. The radiative decay width of $D\Lambda-D\Sigma$ molecular state into $\Xi_c^0\gamma$ final state through hadronic loops are evaluated using effective Lagrangians. We find that decay width $\Xi_c(2923)^0\to\Xi_c^0\gamma$ and $\Xi_c(2923)^0\to\Xi_c^{'0}\gamma$ is evaluated to be approximately 1.23-11.66 KeV and 0.30-3.71 KeV, respectively. These are different from the results~\cite{Wang:2020gkn,Bijker:2020tns} that obtained by assuming $\Xi_c(2923)^0$ may be conventional charmed baryon. If measurements are in future experimental, these differences will be very useful to help us to test various interpretations of $\Xi_c(2923)^0$.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Uses its data or values 1 paper
  • Based on this interpretation, the authors of Ref. [ref] evaluated the widths of the $Ξ_c(2923) →γΞ_c$ and $Ξ_c(2923) →γΞ^'_c$ decays to be approximately 1.23-11.66 keV and 0.30-3.71 keV, respectively.

    An updated review of the new hadron states · $Ξ_c(2923)$, $Ξ_c(2939)$, and $Ξ_c(2965)$. · 0.93

What it cites · 4 sentences without a confident label

Uses data or values from 1 paper
Compares with 1 paper
Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.