REVIEW 1 cited by
Neural Attention Models in Deep Learning: Survey and Taxonomy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Attention is a state of arousal capable of dealing with limited processing bottlenecks in human beings by focusing selectively on one piece of information while ignoring other perceptible information. For decades, concepts and functions of attention have been studied in philosophy, psychology, neuroscience, and computing. Currently, this property has been widely explored in deep neural networks. Many different neural attention models are now available and have been a very active research area over the past six years. From the theoretical standpoint of attention, this survey provides a critical analysis of major neural attention models. Here we propose a taxonomy that corroborates with theoretical aspects that predate Deep Learning. Our taxonomy provides an organizational structure that asks new questions and structures the understanding of existing attentional mechanisms. In particular, 17 criteria derived from psychology and neuroscience classic studies are formulated for qualitative comparison and critical analysis on the 51 main models found on a set of more than 650 papers analyzed. Also, we highlight several theoretical issues that have not yet been explored, including discussions about biological plausibility, highlight current research trends, and provide insights for the future.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Ensemble-Based Survival Models with the Self-Attended Beran Estimator Predictions
SurvBESA applies self-attention to predicted survival functions from bagged Beran estimators and reports improved ranking performance on benchmark survival datasets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.