Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Collaborating with communities: Citizen Science Flood Monitoring in Urban Informal Settlements

Computers and Society · Submitted 14 Dec 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The article identifies how this kind of approach can collect valuable flood data while also promoting opportunities for local communities to be heard in the arena of risk reduction and climate change adaptation.

how it is stated · asserted 0.83 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2112.07128 (version 1)
Pith IDSXRXI2DB, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDiego Ramirez-Lovering, Erich Wolff, Matthew French, Mere Jane Sawailau, Noor Ilhamsyah. "Collaborating with communities: Citizen Science Flood Monitoring in Urban Informal Settlements." arXiv:2112.07128 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/SXRXI2DB
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,998 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.15 · human participants 0.97 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.94 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Concerns regarding the impacts of climate change on marginalised communities in the Global South have led to calls for affected communities to be more active as agents in the process of planning for climate change. While the value of involving communities in risk management is increasingly accepted, the development of appropriate tools to support community engagement in flood risk management projects remains nascent. Using the Revitalising Informal Settlements and their Environment (RISE) Program as a case study, the article interrogates the potential of citizen science to include disadvantaged urban communities in project-level flood risk reduction planning processes. This project collected more than 5000 photos taken by 26 community members living in 13 informal settlements in Fiji and Indonesia between 2018 and 2020. The case study documents the method used as well as the results achieved within this 2-year project. It discusses the method developed and implemented, outlines the main results, and provides lessons learned for others embarking on citizen science environmental monitoring projects. The case study indicates that the engagement model and the technology used were key to the success of the flood-monitoring project. The experiences with the practice of monitoring floods in collaboration with communities in Fiji and Indonesia provide insights into how similar projects could advance more participatory risk management practices. The article identifies how this kind of approach can collect valuable flood data while also promoting opportunities for local communities to be heard in the arena of risk reduction and climate change adaptation.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Concerns regarding the impacts of climate change on marginalised communities in the Global South have led to calls for affected communities to be more active as agents in the process of planning for climate change. background 1.00 0.04 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 While the value of involving communities in risk management is increasingly accepted, the development of appropriate tools to support community engagement in flood risk management projects remains nascent. gap 0.98 0.05 0.02 asserted 0.96
s2 Using the Revitalising Informal Settlements and their Environment (RISE) Program as a case study, the article interrogates the potential of citizen science to include disadvantaged urban communities in project-level flood risk reduction planning processes. contribution 0.99 0.51 0.06 hedged possibility 0.71
s3 This project collected more than 5000 photos taken by 26 community members living in 13 informal settlements in Fiji and Indonesia between 2018 and 2020. method 0.91 0.93 0.03 asserted 1.00
s4 The case study documents the method used as well as the results achieved within this 2-year project. contribution 0.89 0.68 0.03 asserted 0.99
s5 It discusses the method developed and implemented, outlines the main results, and provides lessons learned for others embarking on citizen science environmental monitoring projects. contribution 0.91 0.66 0.06 asserted 0.96
s6 The case study indicates that the engagement model and the technology used were key to the success of the flood-monitoring project. result 0.51 0.88 0.54 hedged possibility 0.89
s7 The experiences with the practice of monitoring floods in collaboration with communities in Fiji and Indonesia provide insights into how similar projects could advance more participatory risk management practices. interpretation 0.91 0.72 0.26 hedged possibility 0.85
s8 The article identifies how this kind of approach can collect valuable flood data while also promoting opportunities for local communities to be heard in the arena of risk reduction and climate change adaptation. interpretation 0.89 0.77 0.51 asserted 0.83

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.81 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.97.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Concerns regarding the impacts of climate change on marginalised communities in the Global South have led to calls for affected communities to be more active as agents in the process of planning for climate change. While the value of involving communities in risk management is increasingly accepted, the development of appropriate tools to support community engagement in flood risk management projects remains nascent. Using the Revitalising Informal Settlements and their Environment (RISE) Program as a case study, the article interrogates the potential of citizen science to include disadvantaged urban communities in project-level flood risk reduction planning processes. This project collected more than 5000 photos taken by 26 community members living in 13 informal settlements in Fiji and Indonesia between 2018 and 2020. The case study documents the method used as well as the results achieved within this 2-year project. It discusses the method developed and implemented, outlines the main results, and provides lessons learned for others embarking on citizen science environmental monitoring projects. The case study indicates that the engagement model and the technology used were key to the success of the flood-monitoring project. The experiences with the practice of monitoring floods in collaboration with communities in Fiji and Indonesia provide insights into how similar projects could advance more participatory risk management practices. The article identifies how this kind of approach can collect valuable flood data while also promoting opportunities for local communities to be heard in the arena of risk reduction and climate change adaptation.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.