Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

VALSE: A Task-Independent Benchmark for Vision and Language Models Centered on Linguistic Phenomena

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.07566 v2 pith:GAJLVPIM submitted 2021-12-14 cs.CL cs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.CV
keywords modelslinguisticvalsephenomenabenchmarklanguagevisionevaluations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose VALSE (Vision And Language Structured Evaluation), a novel benchmark designed for testing general-purpose pretrained vision and language (V&L) models for their visio-linguistic grounding capabilities on specific linguistic phenomena. VALSE offers a suite of six tests covering various linguistic constructs. Solving these requires models to ground linguistic phenomena in the visual modality, allowing more fine-grained evaluations than hitherto possible. We build VALSE using methods that support the construction of valid foils, and report results from evaluating five widely-used V&L models. Our experiments suggest that current models have considerable difficulty addressing most phenomena. Hence, we expect VALSE to serve as an important benchmark to measure future progress of pretrained V&L models from a linguistic perspective, complementing the canonical task-centred V&L evaluations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. COREVQA: A Crowd Observation and Reasoning Entailment Visual Question Answering Benchmark

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    COREVQA introduces a 5,608-pair true/false visual entailment benchmark for crowd images on which the strongest tested vision-language models reach only 77.57% accuracy.

  2. A Good CREPE needs more than just Sugar: Investigating Biases in Compositional Vision-Language Benchmarks

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Blind text-only likelihood models match or exceed CLIP on many compositionality benchmarks because positives and negatives differ systematically in length, plausibility, or image style.

Pith tools