REVIEW 1 cited by
Improving Learning-to-Defer Algorithms Through Fine-Tuning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The ubiquity of AI leads to situations where humans and AI work together, creating the need for learning-to-defer algorithms that determine how to partition tasks between AI and humans. We work to improve learning-to-defer algorithms when paired with specific individuals by incorporating two fine-tuning algorithms and testing their efficacy using both synthetic and image datasets. We find that fine-tuning can pick up on simple human skill patterns, but struggles with nuance, and we suggest future work that uses robust semi-supervised to improve learning.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bayesian Inference for Correlated Human Experts and Classifiers
A Bayesian latent-correlation model with entropy-based query selection predicts expert majority votes while querying fewer human experts than two baseline methods on four image classification tasks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.