pith. sign in

arxiv: 2112.11842 · v2 · submitted 2021-12-22 · ✦ hep-th

Kinematics, cluster algebras and Feynman integrals

Song He , Zhenjie Li , Qinglin Yang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 13:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords cluster algebrasFeynman integralsconformal kinematicssymbol lettersplanar kinematicsD3 cluster algebrawheel integralABJM theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cluster algebras from planar kinematics encode singularities of conformal Feynman integrals in four dimensions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper identifies cluster algebras for the planar kinematics of conformal Feynman integrals in four dimensions as sub-algebras inside the larger cluster algebra of G(4,n) for massless n-point kinematics. These structures are shown to organize the locations of singularities, with the symbol letters of all-loop ladder integrals appearing as cluster variables or their algebraic extensions. A concrete case applies the D3 cluster algebra to an eight-point three-loop wheel integral that introduces a new square root, allowing the symbol to be bootstrapped under the constraint of cluster adjacency. The same algebraic data, when a point is sent to infinity, yields the alphabet for certain non-conformal two-mass-easy integrals up to two loops. Folding the algebras produces three-dimensional versions that appear to capture singularities in ABJM theory through at least n=7 and two loops.

Core claim

We identify cluster algebras for planar kinematics of conformal Feynman integrals in four dimensions, as sub-algebras of that for top-dimensional G(4,n) corresponding to n-point massless kinematics. We provide evidence that they encode information about singularities of such Feynman integrals, including all-loop ladders with symbol letters given by cluster variables and algebraic generalizations. As a highly-nontrivial example, we apply D3 cluster algebra to a n=8 three-loop wheel integral, which contains a new square root. Based on the D3 alphabet and three new algebraic letters essentially dictated by the cluster algebra, we bootstrap its symbol, which is strongly constrained by thecluster

What carries the argument

Sub-algebras of the G(4,n) cluster algebra that correspond to planar kinematics, with the D3 cluster algebra serving as the explicit example that supplies the alphabet and adjacency constraints for the wheel integral.

If this is right

  • Symbol letters of all-loop ladder integrals are given by cluster variables and algebraic generalizations from the identified sub-algebras.
  • The D3 cluster algebra plus three new algebraic letters, together with cluster adjacency, determine the symbol of the n=8 three-loop wheel integral.
  • Limits of the generalized D3 alphabet reproduce the two-mass-easy alphabet for non-conformal integrals up to two loops.
  • Folding produces three-dimensional cluster algebras whose variables encode singularities of amplitudes and integrals in ABJM theory through n=7 and two loops.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same kinematic cluster structure may supply alphabets for integrals beyond the wheel and ladder families once higher-loop examples are examined.
  • Cluster adjacency could serve as a systematic filter when bootstrapping symbols in other four-dimensional conformal theories.
  • The reduction by folding suggests a direct route to testing whether ABJM integrals at higher loops or larger n remain inside the folded cluster alphabets.

Load-bearing premise

The singularities and symbol letters of the Feynman integrals are fully captured by the cluster variables together with the three additional algebraic letters dictated by the D3 algebra.

What would settle it

Finding any conformal Feynman integral whose symbol letters lie outside the proposed cluster-algebra alphabet and its algebraic extensions would falsify the encoding claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2112.11842 by Qinglin Yang, Song He, Zhenjie Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Quivers for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: (8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: kinematics for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: An initial quiver of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We identify cluster algebras for planar kinematics of conformal Feynman integrals in four dimensions, as sub-algebras of that for top-dimensional $G(4,n)$ corresponding to $n$-point massless kinematics. We provide evidence that they encode information about singularities of such Feynman integrals, including all-loop ladders with symbol letters given by cluster variables and algebraic generalizations. As a highly-nontrivial example, we apply $D_3$ cluster algebra to a $n=8$ three-loop wheel integral, which contains a new square root. Based on the $D_3$ alphabet and three new algebraic letters essentially dictated by the cluster algebra, we bootstrap its symbol, which is strongly constrained by the cluster adjacency. By sending a point to infinity, our results have implications for non-conformal Feynman integrals, e.g., up to two loops the alphabet of two-mass-easy kinematics is given by limit of this generalized $D_3$ alphabet. We also find that the reduction to three dimensions is achieved by folding and the resulting cluster algebras may encode singularities of amplitudes and Feynman integrals in ABJM theory, at least through $n=7$ and two loops.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript identifies cluster algebras for planar kinematics of conformal Feynman integrals in four dimensions as sub-algebras of the G(4,n) cluster algebra for n-point massless kinematics. It provides evidence that these structures encode singularities of the integrals, with symbol letters given by cluster variables and algebraic generalizations. The central example applies the D3 cluster algebra to bootstrap the symbol of an n=8 three-loop wheel integral (involving a new square root) using cluster adjacency and exactly three additional algebraic letters. The work also derives implications for non-conformal integrals via point-at-infinity limits and for three-dimensional reductions relevant to ABJM theory via folding.

Significance. If the central identification and bootstrap hold, the paper supplies a systematic method for extracting symbol alphabets of conformal Feynman integrals from cluster sub-algebras, which could streamline bootstrap computations at higher loops. The explicit D3 application to the wheel integral, the handling of algebraic letters, and the limits to two-mass-easy kinematics and ABJM amplitudes constitute concrete advances at the interface of cluster algebras and QFT. The absence of free parameters in the sub-algebra construction and the use of cluster adjacency as a constraint are strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [wheel integral bootstrap section] Section describing the n=8 three-loop wheel bootstrap: the claim that the symbol is fully captured by the D3 cluster variables plus exactly three new algebraic letters (dictated by the algebra) is load-bearing for the central assertion that the cluster structure encodes all singularities. The manuscript does not report an independent cross-check (e.g., reduction to a known two-loop symbol or numerical evaluation of a coefficient) that would confirm no additional letters are required.
  2. [non-conformal limit discussion] Discussion of the limit to non-conformal kinematics: the statement that the two-mass-easy alphabet up to two loops is recovered as a limit of the generalized D3 alphabet requires an explicit letter-by-letter mapping to verify that the limit neither introduces extraneous letters nor drops necessary ones.
minor comments (2)
  1. [cluster algebra identification] A diagram or table explicitly embedding the identified sub-algebras inside G(4,n) would clarify the planar kinematics restriction.
  2. [D3 alphabet definition] Notation for the three algebraic letters could be standardized with the D3 cluster variables to avoid ambiguity in the adjacency relations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive assessment of the work, and constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [wheel integral bootstrap section] Section describing the n=8 three-loop wheel bootstrap: the claim that the symbol is fully captured by the D3 cluster variables plus exactly three new algebraic letters (dictated by the algebra) is load-bearing for the central assertion that the cluster structure encodes all singularities. The manuscript does not report an independent cross-check (e.g., reduction to a known two-loop symbol or numerical evaluation of a coefficient) that would confirm no additional letters are required.

    Authors: We agree that an independent cross-check would strengthen the central claim. The bootstrap is already tightly constrained by cluster adjacency (which forbids many potential letters) and the fact that the three algebraic letters are the minimal extension dictated by the D3 algebra to close under the required relations. Nevertheless, we will add an explicit consistency check by reducing the three-loop symbol to the known two-loop wheel integral (whose symbol is independently known from the literature) and verifying that no extraneous letters appear and all required letters are retained. This will be included in the revised version of Section 4. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [non-conformal limit discussion] Discussion of the limit to non-conformal kinematics: the statement that the two-mass-easy alphabet up to two loops is recovered as a limit of the generalized D3 alphabet requires an explicit letter-by-letter mapping to verify that the limit neither introduces extraneous letters nor drops necessary ones.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit letter-by-letter mapping is needed to make the claim fully rigorous. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated table (or subsection) that lists each two-mass-easy letter, shows its origin as a limit of a specific D3 cluster variable or algebraic letter, and confirms that the limit neither adds nor omits any letters required by the known two-loop results. This will appear in the discussion of the point-at-infinity limit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation not load-bearing; central identification independent

full rationale

The paper identifies sub-cluster algebras of G(4,n) for planar kinematics and applies the D3 case to bootstrap the three-loop wheel symbol using cluster adjacency plus three algebraic letters. No quoted equations reduce any prediction to a fitted input by construction, and the described claims contain no load-bearing self-citation loop or self-definitional reduction. The result is an identification plus evidence from application, remaining self-contained against external symbol benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on the standard properties of cluster algebras and the known symbol structure of Feynman integrals; no free parameters are introduced, no new entities are postulated, and the axioms invoked are standard mathematical facts about cluster algebras and Grassmannians.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Cluster algebras are well-defined combinatorial objects whose variables generate the symbol letters of the integrals under study.
    Invoked when the authors state that symbol letters are given by cluster variables.
  • domain assumption The planar kinematics of conformal integrals embed as subalgebras inside the G(4,n) cluster algebra.
    Central identification stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5724 in / 1495 out tokens · 24476 ms · 2026-05-24T13:06:37.451472+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    we apply D3 cluster algebra to a n=8 three-loop wheel integral... Based on the D3 alphabet and three new algebraic letters... bootstrap its symbol, which is strongly constrained by the cluster adjacency... reduction to three dimensions is achieved by folding

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Scattering Amplitudes and the Positive Grassmannian

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, A. B. Goncharov, A. Postnikov, and J. Trnka, Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2016) arXiv:1212.5605 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    The Amplituhedron

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Trnka, JHEP 10, 030 (2014), arXiv:1312.2007 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    Fomin and A

    S. Fomin and A. Zelevinsky, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 15, 497 (2002); Inventiones math- ematicae 154, 63 (2003); Compositio Mathematica 143, 112 (2007)

    work page 2002

  4. [4]

    L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond, and J. M. Henn, JHEP , 023 (2011), arXiv:1108.4461 [hep-th]; L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond, C. Duhr, M. von Hippel, and J. Pen- nington, PoS LL2014, 077 (2014), arXiv:1407.4724 [hep- th]; L. J. Dixon and M. von Hippel, JHEP 10, 065 (2014), arXiv:1408.1505 [hep-th]; J. M. Drummond, G. Papathanasiou, and M. Spradlin, JHEP 03, 072 ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  5. [5]

    Bootstrapping a Five-Loop Amplitude Using Steinmann Relations

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, A. McLeod, and M. von Hippel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 241601 (2016), arXiv:1609.00669 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    L. J. Dixon, J. Drummond, T. Harrington, A. J. McLeod, G. Papathanasiou, and M. Spradlin, JHEP 02, 137 (2017), arXiv:1612.08976 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    Drummond, J

    J. Drummond, J. Foster, ¨O. G¨ urdo˘ gan, and G. Pa- pathanasiou, JHEP 03, 087 (2019), arXiv:1812.04640 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Caron-Huot, L

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, F. Dulat, M. von Hip- pel, A. J. McLeod, and G. Papathanasiou, JHEP 08, 016 (2019), arXiv:1903.10890 [hep-th]; JHEP 09, 061 (2019), arXiv:1906.07116 [hep-th]; L. J. Dixon and Y.- T. Liu, JHEP 10, 031 (2020), arXiv:2007.12966 [hep- th]; J. Golden and A. J. McLeod, JHEP 06, 142 (2021), arXiv:2104.14194 [hep-th]; S. Caron-Huot, L....

    work page arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu, and A. Volovich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 151605 (2010), arXiv:1006.5703 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    C. Duhr, H. Gangl, and J. R. Rhodes, JHEP 10, 075 (2012), arXiv:1110.0458 [math-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  11. [11]

    Motivic Amplitudes and Cluster Coordinates

    J. Golden, A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu, and A. Volovich, JHEP 01, 091 (2014), arXiv:1305.1617 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  12. [12]

    Cluster Polylogarithms for Scattering Amplitudes

    J. Golden, M. F. Paulos, M. Spradlin, and A. Volovich, J. Phys. A47, 474005 (2014), arXiv:1401.6446 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  13. [13]

    Steinmann, Helvetica Physica Acta 33, 257 (1960); Helvetica Physica Acta 33, 347 (1960)

    O. Steinmann, Helvetica Physica Acta 33, 257 (1960); Helvetica Physica Acta 33, 347 (1960)

    work page 1960

  14. [14]

    Cluster adjacency properties of scattering amplitudes

    J. Drummond, J. Foster, and ¨O. G¨ urdo˘ gan, Phys. 7 Rev. Lett. 120, 161601 (2018), arXiv:1710.10953 [hep- th]; JHEP 03, 086 (2019), arXiv:1810.08149 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    S. He, Z. Li, and C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 101, 061701 (2020), arXiv:1911.01290 [hep-th]; JHEP 03, 278 (2021), arXiv:2009.11471 [hep-th]; Z. Li and C. Zhang, (2021), arXiv:2110.00350 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Jumpstarting the all-loop S-matrix of planar N=4 super Yang-Mills

    S. Caron-Huot and S. He, JHEP 07, 174 (2012), arXiv:1112.1060 [hep-th]; S. Caron-Huot, JHEP 07, 058 (2011), arXiv:1010.1167 [hep-th]; S. Caron-Huot and S. He, JHEP 08, 101 (2013), arXiv:1305.2781 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  17. [17]

    Arkani-Hamed, T

    N. Arkani-Hamed, T. Lam, and M. Spradlin, JHEP 03, 065 (2021), arXiv:1912.08222 [hep-th]; J. Drummond, J. Foster, O. G¨ urdogan, and C. Kalousios, JHEP04, 146 (2020), arXiv:1907.01053 [hep-th]; N. Henke and G. Pa- pathanasiou, JHEP 08, 005 (2020), arXiv:1912.08254 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Drummond, J

    J. Drummond, J. Foster, O. G¨ urdogan, and C. Kalousios, JHEP 04, 002 (2021), arXiv:1912.08217 [hep-th]; N. Henke and G. Papathanasiou, (2021), arXiv:2106.01392 [hep-th]; L. Ren, M. Spradlin, and A. Volovich, (2021), arXiv:2106.01405 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    J. Mago, A. Schreiber, M. Spradlin, and A. Volovich, JHEP 10, 128 (2020), arXiv:2007.00646 [hep-th]; S. He and Z. Li, JHEP 02, 155 (2021), arXiv:2007.01574 [hep- th]; J. Mago, A. Schreiber, M. Spradlin, A. Yellesh- pur Srikant, and A. Volovich, JHEP 04, 056 (2021), arXiv:2012.15812 [hep-th]; (2021), arXiv:2106.01406 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, V. A. Smirnov, and E. Sokatchev, JHEP 01, 064 (2007), arXiv:hep- th/0607160 [hep-th]; J. Drummond, G. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, Nucl. Phys. B 795, 385 (2008), arXiv:0707.0243 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2007

  21. [21]

    J. M. Drummond, J. M. Henn, and J. Trnka, JHEP 04, 083 (2011), arXiv:1010.3679 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, and J. Trnka, JHEP 06, 125 (2012), arXiv:1012.6032 [hep- th]; M. Spradlin and A. Volovich, JHEP 11, 084 (2011), arXiv:1105.2024 [hep-th]; V. Del Duca, L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond, C. Duhr, J. M. Henn, and V. A. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. D 84, 045017 (2011), arXiv:1105.2011 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  23. [23]

    J. L. Bourjaily, S. Caron-Huot, and J. Trnka, JHEP 01, 001 (2015), arXiv:1303.4734 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  24. [24]

    J. Henn, E. Herrmann, and J. Parra-Martinez, JHEP 10, 059 (2018), arXiv:1806.06072 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Herrmann and J

    E. Herrmann and J. Parra-Martinez, JHEP 02, 099 (2020), arXiv:1909.04777 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    J. L. Bourjaily, A. J. McLeod, M. von Hippel, and M. Wilhelm, JHEP 08, 184 (2018), arXiv:1805.10281 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    J. L. Bourjaily, A. J. McLeod, C. Vergu, M. Volk, M. Von Hippel, and M. Wilhelm, JHEP 01, 078 (2020), arXiv:1910.01534 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    S. He, Z. Li, Y. Tang, and Q. Yang, JHEP 05, 052 (2021), arXiv:2012.13094 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    S. He, Z. Li, Q. Yang, and C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 231601 (2021), arXiv:2012.15042 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    The Double Pentaladder Integral to All Orders

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, M. von Hippel, A. J. McLeod, and G. Papathanasiou, JHEP 07, 170 (2018), arXiv:1806.01361 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    S. He, Z. Li, and Q. Yang, JHEP 06, 119 (2021), arXiv:2103.02796 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    S. He, Z. Li, and Q. Yang, (2021), arXiv:2106.09314 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    S. He, Z. Li, and Q. Yang, (2021), arXiv:2108.07959 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Chicherin, J

    D. Chicherin, J. M. Henn, and G. Papathanasiou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 091603 (2021), arXiv:2012.12285 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    L. J. Dixon, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wilhelm, JHEP 04, 147 (2021), arXiv:2012.12286 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    L. J. Dixon, O. Gurdogan, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wil- helm, (2021), arXiv:2112.06243 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes

    A. Hodges, JHEP 05, 135 (2013), arXiv:0905.1473 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  38. [38]

    Speyer and B

    D. Speyer and B. Sturmfels, (2004); D. Speyer and L. Williams, Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics 22, 189 (2005)

    work page 2004

  39. [39]

    The first two are finite types, and the last one is an infi- nite but finite mutation type; for n> 8 they are infinite mutation type

    work page

  40. [40]

    S. He, Z. Li, Y. Tang, and Q. Yang, (2021), arXiv:2106.03709 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    This is the alphabet for a large class of (off-shell) four- point conformal integrals c.f. [53]

    work page

  42. [42]

    Frozen variables can be adjacent to any one, and these conditions have also been checked for penta-box ladders through four loops [33]

    work page

  43. [43]

    They are equivalent to conditions on momentum twistors given in [54]

    These Gram determinant conditions define the parity- invariant subspace [36], since in spinor variables going to D = 3 amounts to identify ˜λ withλ which are related to each other by parity. They are equivalent to conditions on momentum twistors given in [54]

    work page

  44. [44]

    The two-loop six-point amplitude in ABJM theory

    S. Caron-Huot and Y.-t. Huang, JHEP 03, 075 (2013), arXiv:1210.4226 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  45. [45]

    Huang and C.-K

    Y.-t. Huang and C.-K. Kuo, private communications

    work page

  46. [46]

    A well-known example is that the non-DCI kinematics of a triangle (parametrized by two ratios of three masses) can be obtained by sending a point of four-mass box kine- matics to infinity

    work page

  47. [47]

    Abreu, H

    S. Abreu, H. Ita, F. Moriello, B. Page, W. Tschernow, and M. Zeng, JHEP 11, 117 (2020), arXiv:2005.04195 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Note that these 3 odd letters also show up when we de- generate the alphabet of (the family) of two-loop three- mass double box integrals [55]

    work page

  49. [49]

    Y. Guo, L. Wang, and G. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151602 (2021), arXiv:2106.01374 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  50. [50]

    J. L. Bourjaily, A. J. McLeod, M. Spradlin, M. von Hip- pel, and M. Wilhelm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 121603 (2018), arXiv:1712.02785 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  51. [51]

    Kristensson, M

    A. Kristensson, M. Wilhelm, and C. Zhang, (2021), arXiv:2106.14902 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    J. M. Henn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 251601 (2013), arXiv:1304.1806 [hep-th]; J. Phys. A48, 153001 (2015), arXiv:1412.2296 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  53. [53]

    Gluing Ladders into Fishnets

    B. Basso and L. J. Dixon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 071601 (2017), arXiv:1705.03545 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  54. [54]

    Grassmannians for scattering amplitudes in 4d $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM and 3d ABJM

    H. Elvang, Y.-t. Huang, C. Keeler, T. Lam, T. M. Olson, S. B. Roland, and D. E. Speyer, JHEP 12, 181 (2014), arXiv:1410.0621 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  55. [55]

    Dlapa, X

    C. Dlapa, X. Li, and Y. Zhang, (2021), 10.1007/JHEP07(2021)227, arXiv:2103.04638 [hep-th]. 8 Supplemental materials VI. DET AILS OF THE QUIVERS AND ALPHABETS FOR KINEMA TICS In this appendix we provide some details in finding the sub-quivers for planar kinematics as well as their alphabet. Let us first list possible 6-point and 7-point kinematics except for...

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2021)227 2021