Pith. Sign in

RECORD

A Framework for Efficient Memory Utilization in Online Conformance Checking

Software Engineering · Submitted 23 Dec 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our approaches substantially reduce memory consumption by up to 80% on average, while introducing a minor accuracy drop.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2112.13640 (version 1)
Pith IDIXGOZ72W, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBoudewijn F. van Dongen (1) ((1) Department of Mathematics & Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology), Marwan Hassani (1), Rashid Zaman (1). "A Framework for Efficient Memory Utilization in Online Conformance Checking." arXiv:2112.13640 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/IXGOZ72W
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,177 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.11 · states limitation 0.86 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.83 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Conformance checking (CC) techniques of the process mining field gauge the conformance of the sequence of events in a case with respect to a business process model, which simply put is an amalgam of certain behavioral relations or rules. Online conformance checking (OCC) techniques are tailored for assessing such conformance on streaming events. The realistic assumption of having a finite memory for storing the streaming events has largely not been considered by the OCC techniques. We propose three incremental approaches to reduce the memory consumption in prefix-alignment-based OCC techniques along with ensuring that we incur a minimum loss of the conformance insights. Our first proposed approach bounds the number of maximum states that constitute a prefix-alignment to be retained by any case in memory. The second proposed approach bounds the number of cases that are allowed to retain more than a single state, referred to as multi-state cases. Building on top of the two proposed approaches, our third approach further bounds the number of maximum states that the multi-state cases can retain. All these approaches forget the states in excess to their defined limits and retain a meaningful summary of them. Computing prefix-alignments in the future is then resumed for such cases from the current position contained in the summary. We highlight the superiority of all proposed approaches compared to a state of the art prefix-alignment-based OCC technique through experiments using real-life event data under a streaming setting. Our approaches substantially reduce memory consumption by up to 80% on average, while introducing a minor accuracy drop.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Conformance checking (CC) techniques of the process mining field gauge the conformance of the sequence of events in a case with respect to a business process model, which simply put is an amalgam of certain behavioral relations or rules. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Online conformance checking (OCC) techniques are tailored for assessing such conformance on streaming events. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 The realistic assumption of having a finite memory for storing the streaming events has largely not been considered by the OCC techniques. gap 1.00 0.06 0.02 asserted 0.98
s3 We propose three incremental approaches to reduce the memory consumption in prefix-alignment-based OCC techniques along with ensuring that we incur a minimum loss of the conformance insights. contribution 1.00 0.93 0.19 asserted 1.00
s4 Our first proposed approach bounds the number of maximum states that constitute a prefix-alignment to be retained by any case in memory. method 0.69 0.87 0.04 asserted 0.98
s5 The second proposed approach bounds the number of cases that are allowed to retain more than a single state, referred to as multi-state cases. method 0.70 0.85 0.04 asserted 0.98
s6 Building on top of the two proposed approaches, our third approach further bounds the number of maximum states that the multi-state cases can retain. method 0.67 0.90 0.04 asserted 0.99
s7 All these approaches forget the states in excess to their defined limits and retain a meaningful summary of them. method 0.98 0.77 0.06 asserted 1.00
s8 Computing prefix-alignments in the future is then resumed for such cases from the current position contained in the summary. method 0.99 0.57 0.04 asserted 0.99
s9 We highlight the superiority of all proposed approaches compared to a state of the art prefix-alignment-based OCC technique through experiments using real-life event data under a streaming setting. result 0.79 0.93 0.31 asserted 1.00
s10 Our approaches substantially reduce memory consumption by up to 80% on average, while introducing a minor accuracy drop. result 1.00 0.96 0.71 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.96.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Conformance checking (CC) techniques of the process mining field gauge the conformance of the sequence of events in a case with respect to a business process model, which simply put is an amalgam of certain behavioral relations or rules. Online conformance checking (OCC) techniques are tailored for assessing such conformance on streaming events. The realistic assumption of having a finite memory for storing the streaming events has largely not been considered by the OCC techniques. We propose three incremental approaches to reduce the memory consumption in prefix-alignment-based OCC techniques along with ensuring that we incur a minimum loss of the conformance insights. Our first proposed approach bounds the number of maximum states that constitute a prefix-alignment to be retained by any case in memory. The second proposed approach bounds the number of cases that are allowed to retain more than a single state, referred to as multi-state cases. Building on top of the two proposed approaches, our third approach further bounds the number of maximum states that the multi-state cases can retain. All these approaches forget the states in excess to their defined limits and retain a meaningful summary of them. Computing prefix-alignments in the future is then resumed for such cases from the current position contained in the summary. We highlight the superiority of all proposed approaches compared to a state of the art prefix-alignment-based OCC technique through experiments using real-life event data under a streaming setting. Our approaches substantially reduce memory consumption by up to 80% on average, while introducing a minor accuracy drop.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.