Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Representation Topology Divergence: A Method for Comparing Neural Network Representations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.00058 v2 pith:GQF32DOL submitted 2021-12-31 cs.LG cs.AImath.ATmath.KTmath.SG

classification cs.LGcs.AImath.ATmath.KTmath.SG
keywords datarepresentationslearningrepresentationtopologyassessmentcloudscomparing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Comparison of data representations is a complex multi-aspect problem that has not enjoyed a complete solution yet. We propose a method for comparing two data representations. We introduce the Representation Topology Divergence (RTD), measuring the dissimilarity in multi-scale topology between two point clouds of equal size with a one-to-one correspondence between points. The data point clouds are allowed to lie in different ambient spaces. The RTD is one of the few TDA-based practical methods applicable to real machine learning datasets. Experiments show that the proposed RTD agrees with the intuitive assessment of data representation similarity and is sensitive to its topological structure. We apply RTD to gain insights on neural networks representations in computer vision and NLP domains for various problems: training dynamics analysis, data distribution shift, transfer learning, ensemble learning, disentanglement assessment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multimodal Model Diffing for Feature Discovery and Control

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    By diffing base-language and multimodal sparse autoencoder features, MMDiff isolates causally relevant features that can be ablated or steered to control spatial, OCR, and safety behaviors in multimodal LLMs.

  2. DOCS: Quantifying Weight Similarity for Deeper Insights into Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper defines a weight-matrix similarity index based on maximum absolute cosine values and Gumbel fitting, then uses it to show that neighboring transformer layers in open LLMs have similar weights and form clusters.

Pith tools