Pith. Sign in

RECORD

$PT$-symmetric non-Hermitian Hamiltonian and invariant operator in periodically driven $SU(1,1)$ system

Quantum Physics · Submitted 1 Jan 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim It is shown explicitly that the model can be realized by a periodically driven oscillator.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2201.00158 (version 1)
Pith IDHSV67JTY, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJ. -Q. Liang, Xiao-Lei Hao, Xue-Min Bai, Yan Gu. "$PT$-symmetric non-Hermitian Hamiltonian and invariant operator in periodically driven $SU(1,1)$ system." arXiv:2201.00158 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/HSV67JTY
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,863 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.46 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.19 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study in this paper the time evolution of $PT$-symmetric non-Hermitian Hamiltonian consisting of periodically driven $SU(1,1)$ generators. A non-Hermitian invariant operator is adopted to solve the Schr\"{o}dinger equation, since the time-dependent Hamiltonian is no longer a conserved quantity. We propose a scheme to construct the non-Hermitian invariant with a $PT$-symmetric but non-unitary transformation operator. The eigenstates of invariant and its complex conjugate form a bi-orthogonal basis to formulate the exact solution. We obtain the non-adiabatic Berry phase, which reduces to the adiabatic one in the slow time-variation limit. A non-unitary time-evolution operator is found analytically. As an consequence of the non-unitarity the ket ($|\psi (t)\rangle $) and bra ($\langle \psi (t)|$) states are not normalized each other. While the inner product of two states can be evaluated with the help of a metric operator. It is shown explicitly that the model can be realized by a periodically driven oscillator.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study in this paper the time evolution of $PT$-symmetric non-Hermitian Hamiltonian consisting of periodically driven $SU(1,1)$ generators. contribution 0.96 0.89 0.05 asserted 0.93
s1 A non-Hermitian invariant operator is adopted to solve the Schr\"{o}dinger equation, since the time-dependent Hamiltonian is no longer a conserved quantity. method 0.96 0.66 0.07 asserted 1.00
s2 We propose a scheme to construct the non-Hermitian invariant with a $PT$-symmetric but non-unitary transformation operator. method 0.65 0.88 0.12 asserted 0.77
s3 The eigenstates of invariant and its complex conjugate form a bi-orthogonal basis to formulate the exact solution. method 0.96 0.86 0.12 asserted 1.00
s4 We obtain the non-adiabatic Berry phase, which reduces to the adiabatic one in the slow time-variation limit. result 1.00 0.94 0.17 asserted 1.00
s5 A non-unitary time-evolution operator is found analytically. result 0.95 0.96 0.17 asserted 1.00
s6 As an consequence of the non-unitarity the ket ($|\psi (t)\rangle $) and bra ($\langle \psi (t)|$) states are not normalized each other. result 0.55 0.76 0.09 asserted 1.00
s7 While the inner product of two states can be evaluated with the help of a metric operator. method 0.71 0.50 0.05 asserted 0.74
s8 It is shown explicitly that the model can be realized by a periodically driven oscillator. result 0.83 0.85 0.12 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.95 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study in this paper the time evolution of $PT$-symmetric non-Hermitian Hamiltonian consisting of periodically driven $SU(1,1)$ generators. A non-Hermitian invariant operator is adopted to solve the Schr\"{o}dinger equation, since the time-dependent Hamiltonian is no longer a conserved quantity. We propose a scheme to construct the non-Hermitian invariant with a $PT$-symmetric but non-unitary transformation operator. The eigenstates of invariant and its complex conjugate form a bi-orthogonal basis to formulate the exact solution. We obtain the non-adiabatic Berry phase, which reduces to the adiabatic one in the slow time-variation limit. A non-unitary time-evolution operator is found analytically. As an consequence of the non-unitarity the ket ($|\psi (t)\rangle $) and bra ($\langle \psi (t)|$) states are not normalized each other. While the inner product of two states can be evaluated with the help of a metric operator. It is shown explicitly that the model can be realized by a periodically driven oscillator.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
  • Substituting the LR phase Eq.([ref]) into the general solution of the Schrödinger equation ([ref]) we have [equation] where [equation] Assume that the initial state at time $t=0$ is denoted by [equation] The state at time $t$ is generated by the time evolution operator such that [equation] where the time evolution operator is [equation] The time evolution operator is not unitary [equation] since the inverse operator is [equation] while the complex conjugate reads [equation] The bra state [equation] is not normalized with the corresponding ket state [equation] While it can be normalized with the help of metric operator [ref] [equation] In general the inner product of two states $|ψ( t) ⟩$ and $|φ( t) ⟩$ is evaluated as [equation]

    Recovering Unitarity of Lee Model in Bi-Orthogonal Basis · The time-evolution operator · 0.87

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.