Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Observational constraints on nonlinear matter extensions of general relativity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.00591 v1 pith:S44XWZ6F submitted 2022-01-03 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph

classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph
keywords modelsmattercosmologicallagrangiannonlinearconstraintsextensionslambda
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We present a phenomenological analysis of current observational constraints on classes of FLRW cosmological models in which the matter side of Einstein's equations includes, in addition to the canonical term, a term proportional to some function of the energy-momentum tensor ($T^2=T_{\alpha\beta}T^{\alpha\beta}=\rho^2+3p^2$), or of its trace ($T=\rho-3p$). Qualitatively, one may think of these models as extensions of general relativity with a nonlinear matter Lagrangian. As such they are somewhat different from the usual dynamical dark energy or modified gravity models: in the former class of models one adds further dynamical degrees of freedom to the Lagrangian (often in the form of scalar fields), while in the latter the gravitational part of the Lagrangian is changed. We study both of these models under two different scenarios: (1) as phenomenological two-parameter or three-parameter extensions of the standard $\Lambda$CDM, in which case the model still has a cosmological constant but the nonlinear matter Lagrangian leads to additional terms in Einstein's equations, which cosmological observations tightly constrain, and (2) as alternatives to $\Lambda$CDM, where there is no cosmological constant, and the nonlinear matter term would have to provide the acceleration (which would be somewhat closer in spirit to the usual modified gravity models). A comparative analysis of the observational constraints obtained in the various cases provides some insight on the level of robustness of the $\Lambda$ model and on the parameter space still available for phenomenological alternatives.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Temperature-redshift relation in energy-momentum-powered gravity models

    astro-ph.CO 2025-01 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Energy-momentum-powered gravity models violate the standard CMB temperature-redshift relation, and current data constrain the power n to |n|<0.01 (or |n|<0.1 with a cosmological constant).

Pith tools