Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Feature Space Hijacking Attacks against Differentially Private Split Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.04018 v2 pith:KSNI47HA submitted 2022-01-11 cs.CR cs.AI

classification cs.CRcs.AI
keywords learningsplitattackdifferentialpotentialprivacyattacksfeature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Split learning and differential privacy are technologies with growing potential to help with privacy-compliant advanced analytics on distributed datasets. Attacks against split learning are an important evaluation tool and have been receiving increased research attention recently. This work's contribution is applying a recent feature space hijacking attack (FSHA) to the learning process of a split neural network enhanced with differential privacy (DP), using a client-side off-the-shelf DP optimizer. The FSHA attack obtains client's private data reconstruction with low error rates at arbitrarily set DP epsilon levels. We also experiment with dimensionality reduction as a potential attack risk mitigation and show that it might help to some extent. We discuss the reasons why differential privacy is not an effective protection in this setting and mention potential other risk mitigation methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Taxonomy of Attacks and Defenses in Split Learning

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A structured review that classifies split learning attacks and defenses into a three-axis taxonomy (strategy, constraints, effectiveness) and identifies research gaps.

Pith tools