Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Software Engineering User Study Recruitment on Prolific: An Experience Report

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.05348 v2 pith:5M6X5KU7 submitted 2022-01-14 cs.SE cs.HC

Software Engineering User Study Recruitment on Prolific: An Experience Report

classification cs.SE cs.HC
keywords participantsuserprolificresearchersaccessexperienceparticipantprogramming
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Online participant recruitment platforms such as Prolific have been gaining popularity in research, as they enable researchers to easily access large pools of participants. However, participant quality can be an issue; participants may give incorrect information to gain access to more studies, adding unwanted noise to results. This paper details our experience recruiting participants from Prolific for a user study requiring programming skills in Node.js, with the aim of helping other researchers conduct similar studies. We explore a method of recruiting programmer participants using prescreening validation, attention checks and a series of programming knowledge questions. We received 680 responses, and determined that 55 met the criteria to be invited to our user study. We ultimately conducted user study sessions via video calls with 10 participants. We conclude this paper with a series of recommendations for researchers.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. What Motivates Whom? A Survey of Newcomers to OSS and Experienced OSS Practitioners

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Demographics and motivations correlate with OSS project-selection preferences, with distinct patterns for newcomers versus experienced practitioners in a 208-person survey.

  2. The Influence of Fraudulent AI-Generated Responses on Software Engineering Surveys

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Suspicious or AI-assisted survey answers leave most SE quantitative distributions stable but materially change qualitative framing, code prominence, and interpretive evidence.

  3. Academic Integrity and Emotional Responses to Inappropriate LLM Use in Software Engineering Education

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Cross-sectional survey of 116 SE undergraduates finds heterogeneous emotional responses to perceived inappropriate LLM use, dominated by indifference with context-dependent guilt, anxiety, relief, and satisfaction.