REVIEW 3 cited by
Software Engineering User Study Recruitment on Prolific: An Experience Report
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Software Engineering User Study Recruitment on Prolific: An Experience Report
read the original abstract
Online participant recruitment platforms such as Prolific have been gaining popularity in research, as they enable researchers to easily access large pools of participants. However, participant quality can be an issue; participants may give incorrect information to gain access to more studies, adding unwanted noise to results. This paper details our experience recruiting participants from Prolific for a user study requiring programming skills in Node.js, with the aim of helping other researchers conduct similar studies. We explore a method of recruiting programmer participants using prescreening validation, attention checks and a series of programming knowledge questions. We received 680 responses, and determined that 55 met the criteria to be invited to our user study. We ultimately conducted user study sessions via video calls with 10 participants. We conclude this paper with a series of recommendations for researchers.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
What Motivates Whom? A Survey of Newcomers to OSS and Experienced OSS Practitioners
Demographics and motivations correlate with OSS project-selection preferences, with distinct patterns for newcomers versus experienced practitioners in a 208-person survey.
-
The Influence of Fraudulent AI-Generated Responses on Software Engineering Surveys
Suspicious or AI-assisted survey answers leave most SE quantitative distributions stable but materially change qualitative framing, code prominence, and interpretive evidence.
-
Academic Integrity and Emotional Responses to Inappropriate LLM Use in Software Engineering Education
Cross-sectional survey of 116 SE undergraduates finds heterogeneous emotional responses to perceived inappropriate LLM use, dominated by indifference with context-dependent guilt, anxiety, relief, and satisfaction.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.