Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

GreaseLM: Graph REASoning Enhanced Language Models for Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.08860 v1 pith:3JJDMDDZ submitted 2022-01-21 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords knowledgereasoningrepresentationscontextlanguageansweringgraphgreaselm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Answering complex questions about textual narratives requires reasoning over both stated context and the world knowledge that underlies it. However, pretrained language models (LM), the foundation of most modern QA systems, do not robustly represent latent relationships between concepts, which is necessary for reasoning. While knowledge graphs (KG) are often used to augment LMs with structured representations of world knowledge, it remains an open question how to effectively fuse and reason over the KG representations and the language context, which provides situational constraints and nuances. In this work, we propose GreaseLM, a new model that fuses encoded representations from pretrained LMs and graph neural networks over multiple layers of modality interaction operations. Information from both modalities propagates to the other, allowing language context representations to be grounded by structured world knowledge, and allowing linguistic nuances (e.g., negation, hedging) in the context to inform the graph representations of knowledge. Our results on three benchmarks in the commonsense reasoning (i.e., CommonsenseQA, OpenbookQA) and medical question answering (i.e., MedQA-USMLE) domains demonstrate that GreaseLM can more reliably answer questions that require reasoning over both situational constraints and structured knowledge, even outperforming models 8x larger.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FinRipple: Aligning Large Language Models with Financial Market for Event Ripple Effect Awareness

    cs.SI 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    FinRipple aligns LLMs with financial markets via knowledge-graph adapters and PPO using CAPM residuals as reward, claiming strong ripple-effect prediction, but the evaluation is circular and artifacts are unavailable.

  2. From Reddit to Generative AI: Evaluating Large Language Models for Anxiety Support Fine-tuned on Social Media Data

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning GPT-3.5 and Llama 2 on r/Anxiety posts improves readability but raises toxicity and bias while reducing empathy and reflection.

  3. Enhancing Large Language Models with Reliable Knowledge Graphs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A thesis composed of four published papers proposes contrastive KG error detection, attribute-aware error-aware embedding, inductive graph completion, and KG prompting, but adds no new result beyond those papers.

Pith tools