REVIEW 1 cited by
A Knowledge Graph Embeddings based Approach for Author Name Disambiguation using Literals
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Scholarly data is growing continuously containing information about the articles from a plethora of venues including conferences, journals, etc. Many initiatives have been taken to make scholarly data available as Knowledge Graphs (KGs). These efforts to standardize these data and make them accessible have also led to many challenges such as exploration of scholarly articles, ambiguous authors, etc. This study more specifically targets the problem of Author Name Disambiguation (AND) on Scholarly KGs and presents a novel framework, Literally Author Name Disambiguation (LAND), which utilizes Knowledge Graph Embeddings (KGEs) using multimodal literal information generated from these KGs. This framework is based on three components: 1) Multimodal KGEs, 2) A blocking procedure, and finally, 3) Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering. Extensive experiments have been conducted on two newly created KGs: (i) KG containing information from Scientometrics Journal from 1978 onwards (OC-782K), and (ii) a KG extracted from a well-known benchmark for AND provided by AMiner (AMiner-534K). The results show that our proposed architecture outperforms our baselines of 8-14% in terms of the F1 score and shows competitive performances on a challenging benchmark such as AMiner. The code and the datasets are publicly available through Github: https://github.com/sntcristian/and-kge and Zenodo:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6309855 respectively.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Recent Developments in Deep Learning-based Author Name Disambiguation
A literature review finds that deep learning AND methods, especially hybrid supervised-unsupervised approaches, improve performance but rely heavily on the AMiner dataset.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.