Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Systematic Study of Bias Amplification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.11706 v2 pith:F5MWPYRT submitted 2022-01-27 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords amplificationbiasmodeltrainingmembershipwhenbiasesdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent research suggests that predictions made by machine-learning models can amplify biases present in the training data. When a model amplifies bias, it makes certain predictions at a higher rate for some groups than expected based on training-data statistics. Mitigating such bias amplification requires a deep understanding of the mechanics in modern machine learning that give rise to that amplification. We perform the first systematic, controlled study into when and how bias amplification occurs. To enable this study, we design a simple image-classification problem in which we can tightly control (synthetic) biases. Our study of this problem reveals that the strength of bias amplification is correlated to measures such as model accuracy, model capacity, model overconfidence, and amount of training data. We also find that bias amplification can vary greatly during training. Finally, we find that bias amplification may depend on the difficulty of the classification task relative to the difficulty of recognizing group membership: bias amplification appears to occur primarily when it is easier to recognize group membership than class membership. Our results suggest best practices for training machine-learning models that we hope will help pave the way for the development of better mitigation strategies. Code can be found at https://github.com/facebookresearch/cv_bias_amplification.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Rater State Bias in RLHF Preference Data: An Audit Framework

    cs.AI 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper hypothesizes that stressed RLHF raters systematically prefer emotionally validating responses, and proposes an audit framework with five falsifiable predictions to detect this bias in public models.

  2. Bias Analysis in Unconditional Image Generative Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In unconditional image generators, measured attribute bias shifts are small and are strongly influenced by whether the attribute classifier's decision boundary falls in a dense or sparse region of the attribute's dist...

  3. When Algorithms Play Favorites: Lookism in the Generation and Perception of Faces

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Text-to-image models link facial attractiveness to unrelated positive traits, and gender classifiers misclassify faces generated with negative trait labels more often, with the largest effects for non-White women.

Pith tools