Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey on Poisoning Attacks Against Supervised Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.02510 v2 pith:7EV4R3JR submitted 2022-02-05 cs.CR cs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords attackslearningmachinepoisoningsupervisedexistingfuturemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the rise of artificial intelligence and machine learning in modern computing, one of the major concerns regarding such techniques is to provide privacy and security against adversaries. We present this survey paper to cover the most representative papers in poisoning attacks against supervised machine learning models. We first provide a taxonomy to categorize existing studies and then present detailed summaries for selected papers. We summarize and compare the methodology and limitations of existing literature. We conclude this paper with potential improvements and future directions to further exploit and prevent poisoning attacks on supervised models. We propose several unanswered research questions to encourage and inspire researchers for future work.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Deep Learning Model Security: Threats and Defenses

    cs.CR 2024-12 unverdicted

    A broad, textbook-style survey of deep learning attacks and defenses with PyTorch examples, containing no new findings.

Pith tools