REVIEW 2 cited by
Efficiently Escaping Saddle Points in Bilevel Optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Efficiently Escaping Saddle Points in Bilevel Optimization
read the original abstract
Bilevel optimization is one of the fundamental problems in machine learning and optimization. Recent theoretical developments in bilevel optimization focus on finding the first-order stationary points for nonconvex-strongly-convex cases. In this paper, we analyze algorithms that can escape saddle points in nonconvex-strongly-convex bilevel optimization. Specifically, we show that the perturbed approximate implicit differentiation (AID) with a warm start strategy finds $\epsilon$-approximate local minimum of bilevel optimization in $\tilde{O}(\epsilon^{-2})$ iterations with high probability. Moreover, we propose an inexact NEgative-curvature-Originated-from-Noise Algorithm (iNEON), a pure first-order algorithm that can escape saddle point and find local minimum of stochastic bilevel optimization. As a by-product, we provide the first nonasymptotic analysis of perturbed multi-step gradient descent ascent (GDmax) algorithm that converges to local minimax point for minimax problems.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
On the Nature of Regularity Assumptions in Bilevel Optimization with Constrained Lower-level Problem
Requiring LICQ/SCS/SOSC everywhere in bilevel optimization is non-prevalent and rigid, while holding almost everywhere is prevalent, but the distinction introduces fundamental difficulties.
-
Optimization under Persistent State-Dependent Bias: Gradient-based Method and Complexity Analysis
Residual Learning, a proposed bilevel gradient method, claims exact convergence under state-dependent analog-hardware bias with rate O~(kappa1*kappa2^4*sigma^2/(mu*K)).
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.