Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Face Beneath the Ink: Synthetic Data and Tattoo Removal with Application to Face Recognition

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · Submitted 10 Feb 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Additionally, we show that it is possible to improve face recognition accuracy by using the proposed deep learning-based tattoo removal before extracting and comparing facial features.

how it is stated · asserted 0.65 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2202.05297 (version 2)
Pith IDHP5BFQ73, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationChristian Rathgeb, Christoph Busch, Mathias Ibsen, Pawel Drozdowski. "Face Beneath the Ink: Synthetic Data and Tattoo Removal with Application to Face Recognition." arXiv:2202.05297 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/HP5BFQ73
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,428 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.30 · controlled comparison 0.33 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.16 · mentions code or data availability 0.04.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Systems that analyse faces have seen significant improvements in recent years and are today used in numerous application scenarios. However, these systems have been found to be negatively affected by facial alterations such as tattoos. To better understand and mitigate the effect of facial tattoos in facial analysis systems, large datasets of images of individuals with and without tattoos are needed. To this end, we propose a generator for automatically adding realistic tattoos to facial images. Moreover, we demonstrate the feasibility of the generation by using a deep learning-based model for removing tattoos from face images. The experimental results show that it is possible to remove facial tattoos from real images without degrading the quality of the image. Additionally, we show that it is possible to improve face recognition accuracy by using the proposed deep learning-based tattoo removal before extracting and comparing facial features.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Systems that analyse faces have seen significant improvements in recent years and are today used in numerous application scenarios. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 However, these systems have been found to be negatively affected by facial alterations such as tattoos. background 0.95 0.17 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 To better understand and mitigate the effect of facial tattoos in facial analysis systems, large datasets of images of individuals with and without tattoos are needed. gap 0.96 0.07 0.04 asserted 0.98
s3 To this end, we propose a generator for automatically adding realistic tattoos to facial images. contribution 0.84 0.89 0.04 asserted 0.95
s4 Moreover, we demonstrate the feasibility of the generation by using a deep learning-based model for removing tattoos from face images. contribution 0.62 0.93 0.07 asserted 0.99
s5 The experimental results show that it is possible to remove facial tattoos from real images without degrading the quality of the image. result 1.00 0.94 0.27 asserted 0.59
s6 Additionally, we show that it is possible to improve face recognition accuracy by using the proposed deep learning-based tattoo removal before extracting and comparing facial features. result 0.98 0.95 0.52 asserted 0.65

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.94.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Systems that analyse faces have seen significant improvements in recent years and are today used in numerous application scenarios. However, these systems have been found to be negatively affected by facial alterations such as tattoos. To better understand and mitigate the effect of facial tattoos in facial analysis systems, large datasets of images of individuals with and without tattoos are needed. To this end, we propose a generator for automatically adding realistic tattoos to facial images. Moreover, we demonstrate the feasibility of the generation by using a deep learning-based model for removing tattoos from face images. The experimental results show that it is possible to remove facial tattoos from real images without degrading the quality of the image. Additionally, we show that it is possible to improve face recognition accuracy by using the proposed deep learning-based tattoo removal before extracting and comparing facial features.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
  • The loss function is a combination of feature loss (perceptual loss) from [ref] , gram matrix style loss [ref] , and pixel (L1) loss.

    A Neural Algorithm of Artistic Style · Models · 1.00

Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.