Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Explaining Reject Options of Learning Vector Quantization Classifiers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.07244 v1 pith:OF5OYOV5 submitted 2022-02-15 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords rejectexplainingexplanationslearningmodelmodelsoptionsbeen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

While machine learning models are usually assumed to always output a prediction, there also exist extensions in the form of reject options which allow the model to reject inputs where only a prediction with an unacceptably low certainty would be possible. With the ongoing rise of eXplainable AI, a lot of methods for explaining model predictions have been developed. However, understanding why a given input was rejected, instead of being classified by the model, is also of interest. Surprisingly, explanations of rejects have not been considered so far. We propose to use counterfactual explanations for explaining rejects and investigate how to efficiently compute counterfactual explanations of different reject options for an important class of models, namely prototype-based classifiers such as learning vector quantization models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Robust Ambiguity Detection (RAD) From Model- and Feature-Space Consistency

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RAD defines a robust-ambiguity score-pair, model-space and feature-space consistency, that flags and diagnoses unreliable predictions before deployment.

Pith tools