Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Understanding and Improving Graph Injection Attack by Promoting Unnoticeability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.08057 v2 pith:37TH6WRB submitted 2022-02-16 cs.LG cs.CRstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CRstat.ML
keywords graphattackhomophilydefensesflexibilitygnnshighhomophily-based
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently Graph Injection Attack (GIA) emerges as a practical attack scenario on Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), where the adversary can merely inject few malicious nodes instead of modifying existing nodes or edges, i.e., Graph Modification Attack (GMA). Although GIA has achieved promising results, little is known about why it is successful and whether there is any pitfall behind the success. To understand the power of GIA, we compare it with GMA and find that GIA can be provably more harmful than GMA due to its relatively high flexibility. However, the high flexibility will also lead to great damage to the homophily distribution of the original graph, i.e., similarity among neighbors. Consequently, the threats of GIA can be easily alleviated or even prevented by homophily-based defenses designed to recover the original homophily. To mitigate the issue, we introduce a novel constraint -- homophily unnoticeability that enforces GIA to preserve the homophily, and propose Harmonious Adversarial Objective (HAO) to instantiate it. Extensive experiments verify that GIA with HAO can break homophily-based defenses and outperform previous GIA attacks by a significant margin. We believe our methods can serve for a more reliable evaluation of the robustness of GNNs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PEANUT: Perturbations by Eigenvector Alignment for Attacking Graph Neural Networks Under Topology-Driven Message Passing

    cs.LG 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Injecting virtual nodes along the dominant eigenvector of a GNN's own output embeddings degrades task performance in a single black-box query, with no gradients or surrogate models.

  2. Intellectual Property in Graph-Based Machine Learning as a Service: Attacks and Defenses

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic review that organizes graph-ML IP protection into model-level and data-level attacks and defenses, and ships a benchmark library, PyGIP.

Pith tools