Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

UncertaINR: Uncertainty Quantification of End-to-End Implicit Neural Representations for Computed Tomography

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.10847 v3 pith:CD2A3QFN submitted 2022-02-22 eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG

classification eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG
keywords inrsaccuracybayesiandeepreconstructionuncertainruncertaintycalibration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Implicit neural representations (INRs) have achieved impressive results for scene reconstruction and computer graphics, where their performance has primarily been assessed on reconstruction accuracy. As INRs make their way into other domains, where model predictions inform high-stakes decision-making, uncertainty quantification of INR inference is becoming critical. To that end, we study a Bayesian reformulation of INRs, UncertaINR, in the context of computed tomography, and evaluate several Bayesian deep learning implementations in terms of accuracy and calibration. We find that they achieve well-calibrated uncertainty, while retaining accuracy competitive with other classical, INR-based, and CNN-based reconstruction techniques. Contrary to common intuition in the Bayesian deep learning literature, we find that INRs obtain the best calibration with computationally efficient Monte Carlo dropout, outperforming Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and deep ensembles. Moreover, in contrast to the best-performing prior approaches, UncertaINR does not require a large training dataset, but only a handful of validation images.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Posterior Variance Is a Constraint Map, Not an Error Map: Closed-Form Uncertainty for Radiative Gaussian Splatting in Sparse-View CT

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In radiative Gaussian splatting for sparse-view CT, posterior variance is a data-constraint map: it ranks error over the whole volume (14/15 scenes) but collapses inside foreground tissue (median Spearman 0.11, 0/15 s...

Pith tools