Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Agile requirements engineering practices: a survey in Brazilian software development companies

Software Engineering · Submitted 25 Feb 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Moreover, it was noted that, for most respondents, there are yet significant challenges and advances to be made for better efficiency in applying the informed methods.

how it is stated · asserted 0.96 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2202.12956 (version 2)
Pith ID5OAOMULO, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAdolfo Neto, Diego Lisboa, Juan Carlos Barata, Laudelino Cordeiro Bastos. "Agile requirements engineering practices: a survey in Brazilian software development companies." arXiv:2202.12956 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/5OAOMULO
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,208 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.46 · human participants 0.97 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.91 · compares with prior results 0.05 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Requirements Engineering (RE) is one of the prime areas in software development. Since agile software development englobes several emerging techniques and advocates for continuous improvement, it urges the question of which agile RE practices are currently most used, their characteristics, and the challenges in their employment. The aim of this work is to investigate and categorize the collection and specification of agile requirements practices based on how professionals perceive their importance for a software project that applies agile methodologies. Thus, a survey was carried out with forty-six (46) Brazilian software development professionals, inquiring which methods are used for the collection and specification of agile requirements, as well as the features, benefits, and difficulties when employing the methods. The responses allowed us to perform data analysis and identify the relationships between the respondents' experience and the viewpoints on the collection methods and the agile requirements specification. In addition, it was noted that the adoption of these methods is still very recent. They have mainly been used for less than five years. Moreover, it was noted that, for most respondents, there are yet significant challenges and advances to be made for better efficiency in applying the informed methods.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Requirements Engineering (RE) is one of the prime areas in software development. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Since agile software development englobes several emerging techniques and advocates for continuous improvement, it urges the question of which agile RE practices are currently most used, their characteristics, and the challenges in their employment. background 0.56 0.05 0.02 asserted 0.90
s2 The aim of this work is to investigate and categorize the collection and specification of agile requirements practices based on how professionals perceive their importance for a software project that applies agile methodologies. contribution 0.98 0.45 0.04 asserted 0.92
s3 Thus, a survey was carried out with forty-six (46) Brazilian software development professionals, inquiring which methods are used for the collection and specification of agile requirements, as well as the features, benefits, and difficulties when employing the methods. method 0.98 0.96 0.03 asserted 1.00
s4 The responses allowed us to perform data analysis and identify the relationships between the respondents' experience and the viewpoints on the collection methods and the agile requirements specification. method 0.69 0.94 0.05 asserted 1.00
s5 In addition, it was noted that the adoption of these methods is still very recent. result 1.00 0.86 0.11 asserted 0.99
s6 They have mainly been used for less than five years. result 1.00 0.86 0.08 asserted 1.00
s7 Moreover, it was noted that, for most respondents, there are yet significant challenges and advances to be made for better efficiency in applying the informed methods. result 0.97 0.88 0.27 asserted 0.96

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.98 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.93.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Requirements Engineering (RE) is one of the prime areas in software development. Since agile software development englobes several emerging techniques and advocates for continuous improvement, it urges the question of which agile RE practices are currently most used, their characteristics, and the challenges in their employment. The aim of this work is to investigate and categorize the collection and specification of agile requirements practices based on how professionals perceive their importance for a software project that applies agile methodologies. Thus, a survey was carried out with forty-six (46) Brazilian software development professionals, inquiring which methods are used for the collection and specification of agile requirements, as well as the features, benefits, and difficulties when employing the methods. The responses allowed us to perform data analysis and identify the relationships between the respondents' experience and the viewpoints on the collection methods and the agile requirements specification. In addition, it was noted that the adoption of these methods is still very recent. They have mainly been used for less than five years. Moreover, it was noted that, for most respondents, there are yet significant challenges and advances to be made for better efficiency in applying the informed methods.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.