Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MIAShield: Defending Membership Inference Attacks via Preemptive Exclusion of Members

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.00915 v1 pith:BDDIYMOZ submitted 2022-03-02 cs.CR cs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords miashieldsampleexclusionmembershippreemptivedatainferencemember
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In membership inference attacks (MIAs), an adversary observes the predictions of a model to determine whether a sample is part of the model's training data. Existing MIA defenses conceal the presence of a target sample through strong regularization, knowledge distillation, confidence masking, or differential privacy. We propose MIAShield, a new MIA defense based on preemptive exclusion of member samples instead of masking the presence of a member. The key insight in MIAShield is weakening the strong membership signal that stems from the presence of a target sample by preemptively excluding it at prediction time without compromising model utility. To that end, we design and evaluate a suite of preemptive exclusion oracles leveraging model-confidence, exact or approximate sample signature, and learning-based exclusion of member data points. To be practical, MIAShield splits a training data into disjoint subsets and trains each subset to build an ensemble of models. The disjointedness of subsets ensures that a target sample belongs to only one subset, which isolates the sample to facilitate the preemptive exclusion goal. We evaluate MIAShield on three benchmark image classification datasets. We show that MIAShield effectively mitigates membership inference (near random guess) for a wide range of MIAs, achieves far better privacy-utility trade-off compared with state-of-the-art defenses, and remains resilient against an adaptive adversary.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SoK: Can Synthetic Images Replace Real Data? A Survey of Utility and Privacy of Synthetic Image Generation

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A systematic survey and benchmark showing that diffusion-based synthetic data can achieve better utility-privacy tradeoffs than DP-SGD on real data for some image classifiers, with the best release strategy depending ...

Pith tools