Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Modern Gauss-Markov Theorem? Really?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.01425 v5 pith:XGJPWOVQ submitted 2022-03-02 math.ST econ.EMmath.PRstat.TH

A Modern Gauss-Markov Theorem? Really?

classification math.ST econ.EMmath.PRstat.TH
keywords theoremstheoremclassicalcoincidegauss-markovhansenversionaitken
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We show that the theorems in Hansen (2021a) (the version accepted by Econometrica), except for one, are not new as they coincide with classical theorems like the good old Gauss-Markov or Aitken Theorem, respectively; the exceptional theorem is incorrect. Hansen (2021b) corrects this theorem. As a result, all theorems in the latter version coincide with the above mentioned classical theorems. Furthermore, we also show that the theorems in Hansen (2022) (the version published in Econometrica) either coincide with the classical theorems just mentioned, or contain extra assumptions that are alien to the Gauss-Markov or Aitken Theorem.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Extended rank regression for all ordinal data

    stat.ME 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    Extended rank likelihood regression unifies continuous and ordinal outcomes under a monotone latent linear model with no asymptotic efficiency loss at the continuous and binary extremes and practical conditional predi...