RECORD
Thermal entanglement and quantum coherence of a single electron in a double quantum dot with Rashba Interaction
Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics · Submitted 12 Mar 2022
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We observe that the correlated coherence is more robust than the thermal entanglement in all cases, so quantum algorithms based only on correlated coherence may be stronger than those based on entanglement.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
In this work, we study the thermal quantum coherence and fidelity in a semiconductor double quantum dot. The device consists of a single electron in a double quantum dot with Rashba spin-orbit coupling in the presence of an external magnetic field. In our scenario, the thermal entanglement of the single electron is driven by the charge and spin qubits, the latter controlled by Rashba coupling. Analytical expressions are obtained for thermal concurrence and correlated coherence using the density matrix formalism. The main goal of this work is to provide a good understanding of the effects of temperature and several parameters in quantum coherence. In addition, our findings show that we can use the Rashba coupling to tune in the thermal entanglement, quantum coherence, as well as, the thermal fidelity behavior of the system. Moreover, we focus on the role played by thermal entanglement and correlated coherence responsible for quantum correlations. We observe that the correlated coherence is more robust than the thermal entanglement in all cases, so quantum algorithms based only on correlated coherence may be stronger than those based on entanglement.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | In this work, we study the thermal quantum coherence and fidelity in a semiconductor double quantum dot. | contribution 0.99 | 0.86 | 0.03 | asserted 0.67 |
| s1 | The device consists of a single electron in a double quantum dot with Rashba spin-orbit coupling in the presence of an external magnetic field. | method 0.67 | 0.16 | 0.02 | asserted 0.99 |
| s2 | In our scenario, the thermal entanglement of the single electron is driven by the charge and spin qubits, the latter controlled by Rashba coupling. | contribution 0.43 | 0.48 | 0.06 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | Analytical expressions are obtained for thermal concurrence and correlated coherence using the density matrix formalism. | method 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.04 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | The main goal of this work is to provide a good understanding of the effects of temperature and several parameters in quantum coherence. | contribution 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.06 | asserted 0.78 |
| s5 | In addition, our findings show that we can use the Rashba coupling to tune in the thermal entanglement, quantum coherence, as well as, the thermal fidelity behavior of the system. | result 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.35 | asserted 0.77 |
| s6 | Moreover, we focus on the role played by thermal entanglement and correlated coherence responsible for quantum correlations. | contribution 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.07 | asserted 0.60 |
| s7 | We observe that the correlated coherence is more robust than the thermal entanglement in all cases, so quantum algorithms based only on correlated coherence may be stronger than those based on entanglement. | interpretation 0.57 | 0.94 | 0.58 | hedged possibility 0.62 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
In this work, we study the thermal quantum coherence and fidelity in a semiconductor double quantum dot. The device consists of a single electron in a double quantum dot with Rashba spin-orbit coupling in the presence of an external magnetic field. In our scenario, the thermal entanglement of the single electron is driven by the charge and spin qubits, the latter controlled by Rashba coupling. Analytical expressions are obtained for thermal concurrence and correlated coherence using the density matrix formalism. The main goal of this work is to provide a good understanding of the effects of temperature and several parameters in quantum coherence. In addition, our findings show that we can use the Rashba coupling to tune in the thermal entanglement, quantum coherence, as well as, the thermal fidelity behavior of the system. Moreover, we focus on the role played by thermal entanglement and correlated coherence responsible for quantum correlations. We observe that the correlated coherence is more robust than the thermal entanglement in all cases, so quantum algorithms based only on correlated coherence may be stronger than those based on entanglement.
Human review
How the literature uses it
2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences
Papers whose main result relates to this one's
States the same result 1 paper
-
We also highlight the roles of thermal entanglement and correlated coherence in generating quantum correlations, noting that thermal correlated coherence is consistently more robust than thermal entanglement.
Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
Quantum correlations have been studied in many quantum systems, such as Heisenberg spin chain models (for instance, spin-1 Heisenberg chains [ref] , anisotropic spin-1/2 XY chain in transverse magnetic field [ref] ) and quantum dot systems such as two coupled double quantum dots systems [ref] and double quantum dot system with single electron under Rashba interaction [ref] ).
Intrinsic decoherence effects on correlated coherence and quantum discord in XXZ Heisenberg model · Introduction · 0.92
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.