Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey of Non-Rigid 3D Registration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.07858 v2 pith:BMBAS4RU submitted 2022-03-11 cs.CV cs.GRcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.GRcs.LG
keywords non-rigidregistrationmethodsreviewacquisitiondeformationshapessurface
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Non-rigid registration computes an alignment between a source surface with a target surface in a non-rigid manner. In the past decade, with the advances in 3D sensing technologies that can measure time-varying surfaces, non-rigid registration has been applied for the acquisition of deformable shapes and has a wide range of applications. This survey presents a comprehensive review of non-rigid registration methods for 3D shapes, focusing on techniques related to dynamic shape acquisition and reconstruction. In particular, we review different approaches for representing the deformation field, and the methods for computing the desired deformation. Both optimization-based and learning-based methods are covered. We also review benchmarks and datasets for evaluating non-rigid registration methods, and discuss potential future research directions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RatBodyFormer: Rat Body Surface from Keypoints

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new multi-camera dataset and a transformer-based method reconstruct a dense 3D rat body surface from 10 sparse keypoints, with reported mean errors around 5 to 7 mm.

Pith tools