REVIEW 1 cited by
FullSubNet+: Channel Attention FullSubNet with Complex Spectrograms for Speech Enhancement
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Previously proposed FullSubNet has achieved outstanding performance in Deep Noise Suppression (DNS) Challenge and attracted much attention. However, it still encounters issues such as input-output mismatch and coarse processing for frequency bands. In this paper, we propose an extended single-channel real-time speech enhancement framework called FullSubNet+ with following significant improvements. First, we design a lightweight multi-scale time sensitive channel attention (MulCA) module which adopts multi-scale convolution and channel attention mechanism to help the network focus on more discriminative frequency bands for noise reduction. Then, to make full use of the phase information in noisy speech, our model takes all the magnitude, real and imaginary spectrograms as inputs. Moreover, by replacing the long short-term memory (LSTM) layers in original full-band model with stacked temporal convolutional network (TCN) blocks, we design a more efficient full-band module called full-band extractor. The experimental results in DNS Challenge dataset show the superior performance of our FullSubNet+, which reaches the state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance and outperforms other existing speech enhancement approaches.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
LLM Ethics Benchmark: A Three-Dimensional Assessment System for Evaluating Moral Reasoning in Large Language Models
A proposed three-dimensional benchmark for LLM moral reasoning that combines MFQ, WVS, and moral dilemmas, but the reported model scores are not reproducible from the paper.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.