REVIEW 2 cited by
RGBD Object Tracking: An In-depth Review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
RGBD object tracking is gaining momentum in computer vision research thanks to the development of depth sensors. Although numerous RGBD trackers have been proposed with promising performance, an in-depth review for comprehensive understanding of this area is lacking. In this paper, we firstly review RGBD object trackers from different perspectives, including RGBD fusion, depth usage, and tracking framework. Then, we summarize the existing datasets and the evaluation metrics. We benchmark a representative set of RGBD trackers, and give detailed analyses based on their performances. Particularly, we are the first to provide depth quality evaluation and analysis of tracking results in depth-friendly scenarios in RGBD tracking. For long-term settings in most RGBD tracking videos, we give an analysis of trackers' performance on handling target disappearance. To enable better understanding of RGBD trackers, we propose robustness evaluation against input perturbations. Finally, we summarize the challenges and provide open directions for this community. All resources are publicly available at https://github.com/memoryunreal/RGBD-tracking-review.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Neural Field Representations of Mobile Computational Photography
Fitting neural fields directly to raw phone bursts reconstructs depth, separates reflections and occluders, and stitches panoramas, outperforming the compared baselines on the thesis's benchmarks.
-
Visual Object Tracking across Diverse Data Modalities: A Review
A survey that taxonomizes deep-learning visual trackers across RGB, thermal, LiDAR, and four multi-modal combinations, with benchmark tables and future directions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.