Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The orientations of the binary black holes in GWTC-3

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.00968 v1 pith:D3SN4447 submitted 2022-04-03 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

The orientations of the binary black holes in GWTC-3

classification gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords distributionorbitalorientationsinferredastrophysicalbinaryblackcatalog
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

It is expected that the orbital planes of gravitational-wave (GW) sources are isotropically distributed. However, both physical and technical factors, such as alternate theories of gravity with birefringence, catalog contamination, and search algorithm limitations, could result in inferring a non-isotropic distribution. Showing that the inferred astrophysical distribution of the orbital orientations is indeed isotropic can thus be used to rule out some violations of general relativity, as a null test about the purity of the GW catalog sample, and as a check that selection effects are being properly accounted for. We augment the default mass/spins/redshift model used by the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration in their most recent analysis to also measure the astrophysical distribution of orbital orientations. We show that the 69 binary black holes in GWTC-3 are consistent with having random orbital orientations. The inferred distribution is highly symmetric around $\pi/2$, with skewness $\mathcal{S}_{\rm{post}}=0.01^{+0.17}_{-0.17}$. Meanwhile, the median of the inferred distribution has a Jensen-Shannon divergence of $1.4\times 10^{-4}$ bits when compared to the expected isotropic distribution.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How do the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Heavy Black Holes Form? No evidence for core-collapse Intermediate-mass black holes in GWTC-4

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence for core-collapse IMBHs in GWTC-4; heavy BHs from hierarchical mergers, with low-spin mass distribution truncating at ~65 solar masses and PIMG upper edge estimated at 150 solar masses.

  2. How do the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Heavy Black Holes Form? No evidence for core-collapse Intermediate-mass black holes in GWTC-4

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence for core-collapse formed low-spin IMBHs in GWTC-4, with 90% upper limit on merger rate of 0.077 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}, low-spin BH mass truncation at 65 solar masses consistent with pair-instability gap lower e...