Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Automatic Text Summarization Methods: A Comprehensive Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.01849 v1 pith:CUJBIQY3 submitted 2022-03-03 cs.CL cs.IRcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.IRcs.LG
keywords summarizationsummarytextapproachesresearchevaluationimproveinformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

One of the most pressing issues that have arisen due to the rapid growth of the Internet is known as information overloading. Simplifying the relevant information in the form of a summary will assist many people because the material on any topic is plentiful on the Internet. Manually summarising massive amounts of text is quite challenging for humans. So, it has increased the need for more complex and powerful summarizers. Researchers have been trying to improve approaches for creating summaries since the 1950s, such that the machine-generated summary matches the human-created summary. This study provides a detailed state-of-the-art analysis of text summarization concepts such as summarization approaches, techniques used, standard datasets, evaluation metrics and future scopes for research. The most commonly accepted approaches are extractive and abstractive, studied in detail in this work. Evaluating the summary and increasing the development of reusable resources and infrastructure aids in comparing and replicating findings, adding competition to improve the outcomes. Different evaluation methods of generated summaries are also discussed in this study. Finally, at the end of this study, several challenges and research opportunities related to text summarization research are mentioned that may be useful for potential researchers working in this area.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unraveling the Capabilities of Language Models in News Summarization

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 20-model benchmark on three news datasets finds GPT-3.5/GPT-4 lead, a few small models are competitive, and three-shot demonstrations with low-quality gold summaries fail to help.

  2. AutoJourn: Multi-Perspective Summarisation, Bias Detection and Bias Neutralisation for LLM-Generated News in Automated Journalism

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AutoJourn integrates multi-perspective extraction, stance-aware summarization, news generation, and bias detection/neutralization into one LLM-based pipeline for automated journalism.

Pith tools