REVIEW 3 cited by
Data Augmentation for Intent Classification with Off-the-shelf Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Data augmentation is a widely employed technique to alleviate the problem of data scarcity. In this work, we propose a prompting-based approach to generate labelled training data for intent classification with off-the-shelf language models (LMs) such as GPT-3. An advantage of this method is that no task-specific LM-fine-tuning for data generation is required; hence the method requires no hyper-parameter tuning and is applicable even when the available training data is very scarce. We evaluate the proposed method in a few-shot setting on four diverse intent classification tasks. We find that GPT-generated data significantly boosts the performance of intent classifiers when intents in consideration are sufficiently distinct from each other. In tasks with semantically close intents, we observe that the generated data is less helpful. Our analysis shows that this is because GPT often generates utterances that belong to a closely-related intent instead of the desired one. We present preliminary evidence that a prompting-based GPT classifier could be helpful in filtering the generated data to enhance its quality.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Pre-Trained AI Model Assisted Online Decision-Making under Missing Covariates: A Theoretical Perspective
The paper introduces model elasticity to bound the regret of contextual bandits with AI-imputed missing covariates, and shows that MAR-based calibration removes the dominant linear regret term.
-
Training-Free versus Training-Based Intent Classification in LLMs: Accuracy, Robustness, and Failure Modes
Statistical classifiers built on LLM activation norms and coordinates match or beat trained MLP heads on coarse intent routing and resist camouflage better, while MLPs win on fine-grained subfield distinctions.
-
Multi-Intent Recognition in Dialogue Understanding: A Comparison Between Smaller Open-Source LLMs
On MultiWOZ 2.1 multi-intent classification, Mistral-7B-v0.1 beats Llama-2-7B and Yi-6B in few-shot prompting (weighted F1 0.50), while supervised BERT remains far stronger (F1 0.92).
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.