REVIEW 1 cited by
Korean Online Hate Speech Dataset for Multilabel Classification: How Can Social Science Improve Dataset on Hate Speech?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We suggest a multilabel Korean online hate speech dataset that covers seven categories of hate speech: (1) Race and Nationality, (2) Religion, (3) Regionalism, (4) Ageism, (5) Misogyny, (6) Sexual Minorities, and (7) Male. Our 35K dataset consists of 24K online comments with Krippendorff's Alpha label accordance of .713, 2.2K neutral sentences from Wikipedia, 1.7K additionally labeled sentences generated by the Human-in-the-Loop procedure and rule-generated 7.1K neutral sentences. The base model with 24K initial dataset achieved the accuracy of LRAP .892, but improved to .919 after being combined with 11K additional data. Unlike the conventional binary hate and non-hate dichotomy approach, we designed a dataset considering both the cultural and linguistic context to overcome the limitations of western culture-based English texts. Thus, this paper is not only limited to presenting a local hate speech dataset but extends as a manual for building a more generalized hate speech dataset with diverse cultural backgrounds based on social science perspectives.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Can NLP Tackle Hate Speech in the Real World? Stakeholder-Informed Feedback and Survey on Counterspeech
NLP counterspeech research increasingly relies on recycled datasets and excludes the affected communities, according to a systematic review and NGO case study.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.