Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Predicting Solar Flares Using CNN and LSTM on Two Solar Cycles of Active Region Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.03710 v1 pith:TCRTRXRY submitted 2022-04-07 astro-ph.SR cs.AIcs.CV

classification astro-ph.SRcs.AIcs.CV
keywords solaractivedataflarelstmcycleflaresline-of-sight
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We consider the flare prediction problem that distinguishes flare-imminent active regions that produce an M- or X-class flare in the future 24 hours, from quiet active regions that do not produce any flare within $\pm 24$ hours. Using line-of-sight magnetograms and parameters of active regions in two data products covering Solar Cycle 23 and 24, we train and evaluate two deep learning algorithms -- CNN and LSTM -- and their stacking ensembles. The decisions of CNN are explained using visual attribution methods. We have the following three main findings. (1) LSTM trained on data from two solar cycles achieves significantly higher True Skill Scores (TSS) than that trained on data from a single solar cycle with a confidence level of at least 0.95. (2) On data from Solar Cycle 23, a stacking ensemble that combines predictions from LSTM and CNN using the TSS criterion achieves significantly higher TSS than the "select-best" strategy with a confidence level of at least 0.95. (3) A visual attribution method called Integrated Gradients is able to attribute the CNN's predictions of flares to the emerging magnetic flux in the active region. It also reveals a limitation of CNN as a flare prediction method using line-of-sight magnetograms: it treats the polarity artifact of line-of-sight magnetograms as positive evidence of flares.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Explainable AI for Solar Flare Prediction: Quantitative Magnetic Field Analysis of Model-Focused Regions

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A flare-prediction CNN focuses on magnetic regions whose extracted parameters predict flares as well as standard physics-based masks, and these regions show a single-polarity-dominant complexity.

Pith tools