Pith. Sign in

RECORD

How does online teamwork change student communication patterns in programming courses?

Computers and Society · Submitted 8 Apr 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This shift could explain how peer communication improves learning outcomes, as has been shown in previous studies on MOOCs.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2204.04244 (version 1)
Pith IDIUSARB22, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationNatalya Kozhevnikova. "How does online teamwork change student communication patterns in programming courses?." arXiv:2204.04244 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/IUSARB22
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,633 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.17 · human participants 0.94 · controlled comparison 0.87 · randomized assignment 0.03 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.89 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Online teaching has become a new reality due to the COVID-19 pandemic raising a lot of questions about its learning outcomes. Recent studies have shown that peer communication positively affects learning outcomes of online teaching. However, it is not clear how collaborative programming tasks change peer communication patterns in the learning process. In this study, we compare communication patterns in MOOCs where peer communication is limited with those of a blended course in which students are involved in online peer instruction. We used a mixed-method approach comprising automated text analysis and community extraction with further qualitative analysis. The results show that students prefer to seek help in programming from peers and not the teacher. Team assignment helped to support this habit. Students communicated more positively and intensively with each other, while only team leaders communicated with the instructor reducing teacher overload. This shift could explain how peer communication improves learning outcomes, as has been shown in previous studies on MOOCs.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Online teaching has become a new reality due to the COVID-19 pandemic raising a lot of questions about its learning outcomes. background 1.00 0.03 0.01 asserted 1.00
s1 Recent studies have shown that peer communication positively affects learning outcomes of online teaching. background 1.00 0.03 0.04 asserted 1.00
s2 However, it is not clear how collaborative programming tasks change peer communication patterns in the learning process. gap 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 0.72
s3 In this study, we compare communication patterns in MOOCs where peer communication is limited with those of a blended course in which students are involved in online peer instruction. contribution 0.95 0.79 0.03 asserted 0.87
s4 We used a mixed-method approach comprising automated text analysis and community extraction with further qualitative analysis. method 1.00 0.94 0.02 asserted 0.97
s5 The results show that students prefer to seek help in programming from peers and not the teacher. result 1.00 0.92 0.26 asserted 1.00
s6 Team assignment helped to support this habit. result 0.97 0.78 0.07 asserted 1.00
s7 Students communicated more positively and intensively with each other, while only team leaders communicated with the instructor reducing teacher overload. result 0.99 0.92 0.51 asserted 1.00
s8 This shift could explain how peer communication improves learning outcomes, as has been shown in previous studies on MOOCs. interpretation 1.00 0.15 0.34 hedged possibility 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.82.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Online teaching has become a new reality due to the COVID-19 pandemic raising a lot of questions about its learning outcomes. Recent studies have shown that peer communication positively affects learning outcomes of online teaching. However, it is not clear how collaborative programming tasks change peer communication patterns in the learning process. In this study, we compare communication patterns in MOOCs where peer communication is limited with those of a blended course in which students are involved in online peer instruction. We used a mixed-method approach comprising automated text analysis and community extraction with further qualitative analysis. The results show that students prefer to seek help in programming from peers and not the teacher. Team assignment helped to support this habit. Students communicated more positively and intensively with each other, while only team leaders communicated with the instructor reducing teacher overload. This shift could explain how peer communication improves learning outcomes, as has been shown in previous studies on MOOCs.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.