REVIEW 1 cited by
Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness for Fourier Neural Operators
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In recent years, Machine-Learning (ML)-driven approaches have been widely used in scientific discovery domains. Among them, the Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) was the first to simulate turbulent flow with zero-shot super-resolution and superior accuracy, which significantly improves the speed when compared to traditional partial differential equation (PDE) solvers. To inspect the trustworthiness, we provide the first study on the adversarial robustness of scientific discovery models by generating adversarial examples for FNO, based on norm-bounded data input perturbations. Evaluated on the mean squared error between the FNO model's output and the PDE solver's output, our results show that the model's robustness degrades rapidly with increasing perturbation levels, particularly in non-simplistic cases like the 2D Darcy and the Navier cases. Our research provides a sensitivity analysis tool and evaluation principles for assessing the adversarial robustness of ML-based scientific discovery models.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Solver-Integrated Adversarial Attacking and Training of Neural Operators
Solver-integrated PGD attacks produce stronger adversarial examples for neural operators than dictionary-based attacks, and round-based retraining improves some out-of-distribution accuracy but with mixed, costly results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.