REVIEW 6 cited by
WSSS4LUAD: Grand Challenge on Weakly-supervised Tissue Semantic Segmentation for Lung Adenocarcinoma
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, and adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common subtype. Exploiting the potential value of the histopathology images can promote precision medicine in oncology. Tissue segmentation is the basic upstream task of histopathology image analysis. Existing deep learning models have achieved superior segmentation performance but require sufficient pixel-level annotations, which is time-consuming and expensive. To enrich the label resources of LUAD and to alleviate the annotation efforts, we organize this challenge WSSS4LUAD to call for the outstanding weakly-supervised semantic segmentation (WSSS) techniques for histopathology images of LUAD. Participants have to design the algorithm to segment tumor epithelial, tumor-associated stroma and normal tissue with only patch-level labels. This challenge includes 10,091 patch-level annotations (the training set) and over 130 million labeled pixels (the validation and test sets), from 87 WSIs (67 from GDPH, 20 from TCGA). All the labels were generated by a pathologist-in-the-loop pipeline with the help of AI models and checked by the label review board. Among 532 registrations, 28 teams submitted the results in the test phase with over 1,000 submissions. Finally, the first place team achieved mIoU of 0.8413 (tumor: 0.8389, stroma: 0.7931, normal: 0.8919). According to the technical reports of the top-tier teams, CAM is still the most popular approach in WSSS. Cutmix data augmentation has been widely adopted to generate more reliable samples. With the success of this challenge, we believe that WSSS approaches with patch-level annotations can be a complement to the traditional pixel annotations while reducing the annotation efforts. The entire dataset has been released to encourage more researches on computational pathology in LUAD and more novel WSSS techniques.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
A Clinically Validated Foundation Model for Comprehensive Lung Pathology Interpretation
PulmoFoundation achieves 92.3% average AUC on 32 lung pathology tasks in prospective validation and raises pathologist accuracy from 83.8% to 91.7% in a crossover RCT.
-
From Multi-Resolution Cells to Gigapixel Whole Slide Images Foundation Model for Computational Pathology
MRPT, a multi-resolution hierarchical transformer pre-trained on 36K whole-slide images, is reported to outperform prior pathology foundation models on 34 classification, captioning, and VQA datasets.
-
ALICE: Learning a General-Purpose Pathology Foundation Model from Vision, Vision-Language, and Slide-Level Experts
Multi-stage agglomerative distillation consolidates eight vision, vision-language, and slide-level pathology teachers into one backbone that ranks first on average across 96 downstream tasks.
-
A Versatile Pathology Co-pilot via Reasoning Enhanced Multimodal Large Language Model
A single pathology vision-language model trained with supervised and reinforcement fine-tuning beats four prior MLLMs across 72 ROI-level and slide-level tasks.
-
A tissue and cell-level annotated H&E and PD-L1 histopathology image dataset in non-small cell lung cancer
The IGNITE data toolkit provides 887 annotated regions from 155 patients for H&E tissue segmentation, nuclei detection, and PD-L1 positive tumor cell detection in NSCLC, including metastatic sites.
-
Segment Anything in Pathology Images with Natural Language
PathSegmentor is a text-prompted segmentation foundation model for pathology images, trained on a new 160-category, 275k-sample benchmark, and reports higher Dice scores than specialized and prior foundation baselines.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.