Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 148 references

A hierarchical multi-resolution transformer for whole slide images outperforms single-resolution foundation models across cancer subtyping, tissue phenotyping, and WSI question answering.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

MRPT, a multi-resolution hierarchical transformer pre-trained on 36K whole-slide images, is reported to outperform prior pathology foundation models on 34 classification, captioning, and VQA datasets.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Multi-resolution hierarchical SSL for WSIs is a promising and well-ablated idea, but the reported margins rest on a protocol that needs verification before the SOTA claims can be taken at face value. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2608.03508 v1 pith:7IN2LPH5 submitted 2026-08-04 cs.CV

From Multi-Resolution Cells to Gigapixel Whole Slide Images Foundation Model for Computational Pathology

Basit Alawode , Moshira Ali Abdalla , Dwarikanath Mahapatra , Muhammad Muzammal Naseer , Sajid Javed This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords computational pathologywhole slide imagemulti-resolution representation learningself-supervised learningvision transformervisual question answeringfoundation modelhistopathology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Pathologists diagnose gigapixel tissue slides by moving between magnifications, but most computational pathology foundation models are trained at a single resolution. This paper argues that a model should do the same: MRPT is a Vision Transformer that builds a hierarchy of cell-, patch-, region-, and WSI-level representations while fusing information across 10x, 20x, and 40x views of the same tissue region. Pre-trained self-supervised on 624M patches, 2.4M regions, and 36K whole slide images, it is evaluated on 34 public datasets and reported to beat recent single-resolution foundation models and multimodal LLMs on cancer subtype classification, tissue phenotyping, and visual question answering. The claim matters because multi-resolution, hierarchical representations could give pathology AI both the global context and the cellular detail that diagnosis requires, and the proposed attention mechanism is designed to stay computationally linear. The paper also pairs MRPT with LLaVA to make a WSI-level conversational model, MRPT-LLaVA, that answers questions about whole slides.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that jointly modelling the intrinsic hierarchy and multi-resolution structure of WSIs produces the best whole-slide representations yet reported. MRPT decomposes each gigapixel slide into spatially aligned triplets at 10x, 20x, and 40x, then learns representations in three self-supervised stages: a cell-level transformer (mViTP-C) fuses consecutive resolutions through a Consecutive Cross-Resolution Attention (CCRA) mechanism, patch-level ViT (ViTR-P) aggregates those embeddings, and region-level ViT (ViTM-R) aggregates them into a WSI-level [CLS] token. CCRA exchanges information only between adjacent magnifications by averaging their class tokens and letting the

What carries the argument

Consecutive Cross-Resolution Attention (CCRA): a fusion mechanism that exchanges information only between adjacent magnifications (10x<->20x and 20x<->40x) by averaging the [CLS] tokens of two resolutions, appending the average to the finer sequence, and using the averaged token as a query attending to that sequence. Because the query is a single vector, CCRA is linear in the number of tokens. It sits inside a three-stage hierarchical SSL stack—mViTP-C at the cell level, ViTR-P at the patch/region level, and ViTM-R at the WSI level—so that each higher level re-uses frozen lower-level multi-resolution embeddings. CCRA is what carries the paper's claim that cross-resolution fusion is both biol

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the assertion in the data-section note that no testing slide was used during pre-training for the TCGA-RCC and CPTAC-NSCLC evaluations; the paper offers no manifest, code, or reproducible split to confirm the test slides were disjoint from the 36K WSIs.

What would settle it

Release the exact slide lists used for pre-training and the exact test splits for TCGA-RCC and CPTAC-NSCLC, then recompute the reported zero-shot and linear-probe scores after removing any slide that appears in both. If scores drop materially, the claimed generalization advantage is at least partly memorization; if they hold, the held-out claim is confirmed.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the reported gains are real, single-resolution patch-level and WSI-level foundation models are leaving a substantial amount of diagnostic signal unused; multi-resolution hierarchical pre-training should become the default recipe for WSI representation learning.
  • Multi-resolution hierarchical embeddings transfer strongly with linear probes and few-shot classifiers, so small labelled cohorts—rare subtypes, under-represented stains, new scanners—could get better performance without training large models.
  • WSI-level visual question answering improves when the LLM sees hierarchical multi-resolution visual tokens rather than only patch-level features, suggesting that the next generation of pathology MLLMs should be built on multi-scale encoders.
  • The consecutive-attention design keeps the added computation modest (about 1.1 TFLOPs per WSI in one reported configuration, comparable to single-resolution baselines), making multi-resolution WSI modelling practical on standard GPU workstations.
  • MRPT's reported consistency across 10x/20x/40x inputs implies a single model can handle slides scanned at different magnifications without per-resolution retraining.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the CCRA design presumes that the same anatomical region is spatially aligned across resolutions; a direct test would be to inject controlled misregistration into the multi-resolution triplets and measure how quickly the advantage over single-resolution encoders erodes.
  • Beyond the paper: if the matched-data result in Table 3 generalizes, it predicts that smaller multi-resolution pre-training corpora can rival much larger single-resolution corpora—an experiment that would isolate whether the gains come from resolution diversity or raw data volume.
  • Beyond the paper: the paper's consecutive-resolution constraint is a strong inductive bias; one could test it on whole-slide scans with only 5x/40x available (common in legacy archives) to see whether synthetic intermediate resolutions recover the benefit or whether the locality assumption fails without a real 20x scan.
  • Beyond the paper: because MRPT-LLaVA couples a frozen MRPT encoder to a small LLM, a natural extension is to treat MRPT as a drop-in visual encoder for other instruction-tuned models and to measure whether the multi-resolution hierarchy is as beneficial for open-ended clinical questions as it is for closed-set benchmarks.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces MRPT, a hierarchical multi-resolution whole-slide-image (WSI) foundation model. It pre-trains three Transformer stages — cell-level mViTP-C with a Consecutive Cross-Resolution Attention (CCRA) mechanism, patch/region-level ViTR-P, and region/WSI-level ViTM-R — using DINO-style multi-resolution self-supervised learning on 30,000 TCGA and 6,000 CPTAC WSIs. A multimodal extension, MRPT-LLaVA, is built by aligning MRPT features with Qwen2-1.5B and instruction-tuning on WSI-Bench for VQA/report generation. The authors report state-of-the-art results across 34 datasets for patch- and WSI-level classification, VQA, captioning, and report generation. The central claim is that joint hierarchical multi-resolution SSL with consecutive cross-resolution attention produces the best WSI representations to date.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold, MRPT would be a substantial advance: it is one of the few attempts to jointly model hierarchical tissue structure and multi-resolution information, and the linear CCRA design is computationally inexpensive. The large-scale pre-training (624M patches, 2.4M regions, 36K WSIs) and the component-wise ablations are also valuable. However, the evaluation protocol currently prevents verification of the SOTA claims. The absence of slide-level split manifests for TCGA-RCC/CPTAC-NSCLC, the use of PANDA/BRAINS/UBC-OCEAN for both model selection and final reporting, and the mislabeled “zero-shot” VQA comparisons are load-bearing issues that must be fixed before the claims can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [§17, Fig. 3c, Table 22] The patch-level VQA comparison is not zero-shot. The proposed mViTP-C-LLaVA and mViTR-P-LLaVA models undergo Stage 3 instruction tuning on QuiltInstruct (107,131 pairs; Section 17), while GPT-4V, LLaVA, Quilt-LLaVA, etc. are evaluated without such tuning. Reporting this as “Zero-shot VQA” in Fig. 3c and in the text inflates the apparent margin (e.g., 78.8% vs 60.1% on PathMMU Tiny). Please rename the protocol and compare against baselines that receive the same instruction tuning, or compare all models in true zero-shot mode. The same concern applies to WSI-Bench in Table 19: MRPT-LLaVA is fine-tuned on the WSI-Bench training set (Section 16.3) before being evaluated on its test set; this should be labeled as in-domain fine-tuning.
  2. [§4.2, Tables 2/4/5 and Supp. Tables 8/9; §4.3, Tables 15/16] Model selection and main results use the same benchmarks. The mViTP-C variant, number of resolutions, CCRA vs distant attention, K/Q values, and token fusion methods are all selected on PANDA, BRAINS, and UBC-OCEAN (Tables 2, 5, 8, 9). These three datasets then appear in the headline zero-shot and linear-probe results (Tables 15/16, Fig. 3d/e). This is selection on the test set; part of the reported gain is therefore model-selection bias. Please hold out a separate model-selection set (or use nested cross-validation) and report final numbers on data not used in any ablation.
  3. [§21, §23.1, Tables 15/16] Pre-training/evaluation overlap is unverified. The pre-training corpus includes 30,000 TCGA WSIs and 6,000 CPTAC WSIs, including kidney and LUAD/LUSC cases (Section 21). The main WSI classification results include TCGA-RCC and CPTAC-NSCLC (Tables 15/16). Section 23.1 asserts for TCGA-RCC that no testing slide was used, but it provides no slide-level manifest, TCGA barcode list, or split-generation code, and no analogous statement or manifest is given for CPTAC-NSCLC. Without these, a reader cannot exclude that the held-out test slides are in the pre-training set. This is load-bearing because the zero-shot and linear-probe gains on these two datasets (e.g., MRPT-LLaVA BA 0.961/0.972 vs TITAN 0.916/0.94 in Table 15) are central to the cancer-subtype claim. Please release exact slide IDs and splits for both datasets.
  4. [§4.2, Table 3] The “matched-data” experiment in Table 3 does not remove the pre-training overlap concern. MRPT is pre-trained on TCGA slides and then evaluated on TCGA test splits (TCGA-NSCLC, TCGA-RCC, TCGA-BRCA). Even if all methods use identical downstream train/test folds, the pre-training corpus may contain the test slides. The claim that gains “stem from hierarchical multi-resolution SSL” rather than from data overlap requires slide-level split verification, not just identical downstream folds.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (2)] The definition of S'_{r+1} uses S_r and an averaged [CLS] token, but the text says the averaged token is appended to the “finer sequence.” Please clarify which resolution is the concatenation target and align the notation.
  2. [Abstract, §4] The abstract and Section 4 say code and models are available “on link,” but no actual link or repository identifier is given. Please include an anonymized repository, model card, and the split manifests needed to reproduce the held-out settings.
  3. [Tables 2, 4, 5] Several tables report values as 0-1 proportions while the text reports percentages (e.g., “Experiment D averages 86.30%” vs Table 2’s 0.866). Please unify the notation.
  4. [Supplementary §12] The “Theoretical Insights” section presents manifold continuity and hierarchical compositionality as assumptions; they are not proven theorems. Please label them as motivating assumptions to avoid overclaiming theoretical grounding.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No equation-level circularity: MRPT's encoders compose as stated and CCRA is validated by ablation, not assumed. Partial issue: the architecture and fusion hyperparameters are selected on the PANDA/BRAINS/UBC-OCEAN test splits, and the same splits reappear as main-result evidence (PANDA linear-probe BA 0.866 is identical in selection Table 2 and final Table 16), making part of the reported gain a

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.2 (Tables 2, 5, 8, 9) vs. Section 4.3 item 6 / Fig. 3e / Table 16]
    "All MRPT variants outperform HIPT [25], validating multi-resolution hierarchical representations. mViTP-C-B yields the strongest results among tiny/small/backbone options; thus we report MRPT with mViTP-C-B thereafter. ... Using MRPT's WSI-level features with a linear classifier, we compare against PRISM, TITAN, GigaPath, and CHIEF. MRPT averages 0.898 balanced accuracy vs. 0.845 for TITAN, underscoring the advantage of multi-resolution cues."

    The reported model configuration (mViTP-C-B, ACT+CCRA+[CLS] Concat, K=1, Q=4, 3-stage SSL) is selected by maximizing balanced accuracy on PANDA, BRAINS, and UBC-OCEAN test splits (Tables 2/5/8/9; e.g., Table 2 row D mViTP-C-B PF+LP = 0.866 on PANDA). These same three datasets then appear in the main SOTA comparisons (Fig. 3e/Table 16), where the PANDA linear-probe BA is again 0.866. The headline gains on these three benchmarks are therefore partly the selection criterion itself, reported as prediction — a test-set model-selection pattern rather than a parameter fit. It affects only 3 of the 10 WSI-classification datasets; external benchmarks (Camelyon17, HunCRC, DHMC-RCC, BRACS, 13 patch-level sets) were not used in ablations, so the central multi-resolution-SSL claim retains independent s

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained: Eq. (1) composes mViTP-C, ViTR-P, and ViTM-R without presupposing their outputs; the SSL objectives are standard DINO-style local-to-global alignments (Eq. 6); CCRA (Eqs. 2-4) is a newly defined mechanism whose benefit is established empirically (Tables 5, 8) rather than imported. No component is defined in terms of a downstream benchmark, so there is no self-definitional circularity and no Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction. Two same-group citations exist — [5] MR-PLIP (Alawode, Javed) and [58] CPLIP (Javed) — but they are used only for positioning ('MR-PLIP is the only multi-resolution patch-level model') and as comparison baselines; neither supplies a supporting theorem, uniqueness result, or ansatz, so per the hard rules they are not load-bearing and do not raise the score materially. The one concrete partial-circularity finding is benchmark reuse in model selection: Tables 2/4/5/8/9 choose backbone size, fusion strategy, and CCRA configuration by test accuracy on PANDA, BRAINS, and UBC-OCEAN, and Section 4.3 then presents SOTA-level numbers on those same datasets (PANDA 0.866 recurs from selection to final table). This is a genuine but limited selection-on-test component — 3 of 10 WSI-classification datasets and none of the patch-level or VQA suites. The paper's central claim of improved WSI representation quality is independently grounded in external datasets, so it does not reduce to a fit; the honest score is 3, reflecting the partial artifact without overstating it. Finally, the review rule requires flagging the unverifiable support passage in Section 23.1: 'Kindly note that we did not utilize any testing slide during the pre-training process of MRPT. All TCGA dataset results are reported under the test held-out setting.' Since pre-training uses 30K TCGA + 6K CPTAC WSIs (Section 21) and the key subtype results are TCGA-RCC and CPTAC-NSCLC, the absence of a slide-level manifest makes disjointness unverifiable — a correctness/data-integrity risk, explicitly excluded from the circularity score here but flagged for the correctness pass.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's contribution is empirical; it does not derive a law or constant. The ledger captures the hand-set architecture choices (K, Q, dimensions, view budgets) and the three domain assumptions (co-registration, manifold locality, data disjointness) that the central claim rests on. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • CCRA layers K = 1
    Ablation in Table 9 selects K=1 as the accuracy/compute sweet spot on PANDA, BRAINS, UBC-OCEAN.
  • Hierarchical fusion blocks Q = 4
    Ablation in Table 9; larger Q increases cost without accuracy gains.
  • mViTP-C branch embedding dimensions = 384 (10x), 768 (20x), 768 (40x)
    Hand-set architecture choice, ablated in Table 9; equal-dimension variants performed worse.
  • DINO local/global view budget per resolution = 8 local views, 2 global views
    Chosen in Equation (6) following DINO defaults; no pathology-specific tuning is reported.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Co-registration of 10x, 20x, and 40x patches is exact: an 8x8 10x cell token, a 16x16 20x token, and a 32x32 40x token cover the same physical tissue area.
    Section 3.1 assumes spatial alignment and contextual integrity across resolutions; any error in co-registration would corrupt the CCRA fusion that the central claim depends on.
  • ad hoc to paper Adjacent resolutions lie closer in feature space than distant ones (manifold locality), justifying consecutive-only cross-attention.
    Supplementary Sections 12 and 15 assert this as theoretical grounding, but no formal proof is given. The restriction to 10x-20x and 20x-40x pairs is validated only through ablations on three datasets (Table 8).
  • domain assumption Evaluation slides from TCGA and CPTAC are disjoint from the pre-training WSIs.
    Section 23.1 states held-out settings for TCGA-RCC and CPTAC-NSCLC, but no data manifest or split verification is provided. This assumption is load-bearing for the reported zero-shot and linear-probe results on those datasets.
  • domain assumption DINO SSL objectives transfer to multi-resolution pathology inputs.
    The three-stage SSL (Sections 14.1-14.3) relies on DINO's teacher-student local-global alignment working on histology crops at multiple resolutions, an assumption inherited from prior work without re-validation.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of From Multi-Resolution Cells to Gigapixel Whole Slide Images Foundation Model for Computational Pathology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7IN2LPH5

@misc{pith2026260803508,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: From Multi-Resolution Cells to Gigapixel Whole Slide Images Foundation Model for Computational Pathology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7IN2LPH5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03508}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Vision Transformers (ViTs) and their hierarchical variants have achieved strong performance in Computational Pathology (CPath). However, most are pre-trained on single-resolution Whole Slide Images (WSIs), limiting their generalization across arbitrary resolutions. Gigapixel WSIs inherently contain diagnostic patterns at multiple scales, including cellular morphologies, tissue architectures, and global context, mirroring how expert pathologists examine WSIs. We introduce Multi-Resolution Pyramid Transformer (MRPT), a model that hierarchically aggregates multi-resolution information from cellular to tissue and WSI levels. MRPT employs a biologically meaningful Consecutive Cross-Resolution Attention (CCRA) mechanism to capture scale-independent interactions and enforces multi-resolution semantic consistency by aligning embeddings across resolutions, yielding robust and generalizable WSI representations. Pre-trained in a multi-resolution self-supervised manner on 624M patches, 2.4M regions, and 36K WSIs, MRPT learns rich coarse-to-fine histopathology features. Extensive experiments on 34 diverse datasets show that MRPT surpasses recent foundation models and Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in cancer subtype classification, tissue phenotyping, and Visual Question Answering (VQA) for WSI understanding.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.03508 by Basit Alawode, Dwarikanath Mahapatra, Moshira Ali Abdalla, Muhammad Muzammal Naseer, Sajid Javed.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) and (b): Our MRPT model remains consistent across resolutions and out￾performs existing SOTA models by a significant margin. (c): MRPT exploits hierar￾chical and multi-resolution representations to capture rich contextual information from WSIs. comprising individual cellular entities (e.g., tumor cells, stroma, lymphocytes) form local clusters that capture cell-cell interactions [25]. These clusters ag… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: An overview of proposed MRPT architecture, which comprises three hierar￾chical pre-training stages: (a)-(b) cell-level (mViTP-C), (c) patch-level (ViTR-P), and (d) region-level (ViTM-R). The cell-level ViT, mViTP-C, employs multi-resolution SSL paradigm. The teacher and student networks learn multi-resolution representations us￾ing the proposed Consecutive Cross-Resolution Attention (CCRA) mechanism that f… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Proposed mViTP-C-LLaVA, mViTR-P-LLaVA, mViTP-C, mViTR-P, MRPT, and MRPT-LLaVA outperform SOTA models. 4.1 Evaluation Setup For classification task, we used Balanced Accuracy (BA), weighted F1, and Accu￾racy (A) [26, 77]. For captioning and report generation: BLEU-2/4, ROUGE-L, and METEOR. For VQA: accuracy (closed-ended) and recall, where applicable. For classification, we compare against CLIP [87], PLIP [… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Interpretability analysis (cancer heatmaps). 12 Theortical Insights 12.1 Significance of Multi-Resolution Hierarchical Gigapixel WSI Representation Histopathological interpretation is inherently a hierarchical and resolution-dependent process, where diagnostic reasoning emerges from the integration of morpholog￾ical information observed across multiple resolutions ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Compares SOTA HIPT model [25] (left) with the proposed MRPT model (right). MRPT UNI GigaPath CONCH CHIEF HIPT PLIP Classification PANDA (40x) PANDA (20x) PANDA (10x) HunCRC (40x) HunCRC (20x) HunCRC (10x) NSCLC (40x) NSCLC (20x) NSCLC (10x) EB30 (40x) EB30 (20x) EB30 (10x) BRACS (40x) BRACS (20x) BRACS (10x) RCC (40x) RCC (20x) RCC (10x) MrHIPT UNI GigaPath CONCH CHIEF HIPT PLIP 81.1 81.56 79.89 73.66 75.4… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Our MRPT model remains consistent across resolutions and outperforms ex￾isting SOTA models by a significant margin. chical reasoning employed by expert pathologists. These properties collectively enable MRPT to produce context-aware, scale-invariant, and clinically inter- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison between SOTA CPath WSI-level MLLMs [27,69] with the proposed MRPT-LLaVA. Oru model integrates multi-resolution hierarchical WSI-level represen￾tations with LLM to improve complex pathology VQA and report generation tasks. pretable representations, setting the foundation for a robust and generalizable CPath model. 13 Multi-resolution Pyramid Transformer (MRPT) Our Multi-Resolution Pyramid Transfo… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Schematic illustration of our proposed multi-resolution cellular transformer (mViTP-C) employing multi-resolution Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) framework, where teacher and student networks utilize multi-resolution global and local views, employ the CCRA module, and then aggregate the final multi-resolution representa￾tion. MRPT employs a multi-resolution Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) framework at each h… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

148 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.08905 (2024) 26 16 B

    Abdin, M., Aneja, J., Behl, H., Bubeck, S., Eldan, R., Gunasekar, S., Harrison, M., Hewett, R.J., Javaheripi, M., Kauffmann, P., et al.: Phi-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.08905 (2024) 26 16 B. Alawode et al

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    The Journal of pathology249(3), 286–294 (2019) 1, 30

    Abels, E., Pantanowitz, L., Aeffner, F., Zarella, M.D., Van der Laak, J., Bui, M.M., Vemuri, V.N., Parwani, A.V., Gibbs, J., Agosto-Arroyo, E., et al.: Compu- tational pathology definitions, best practices, and recommendations for regulatory guidance: a white paper from the digital pathology association. The Journal of pathology249(3), 286–294 (2019) 1, 30

    2019

  3. [3]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.69801412(2014) 11

    Adam, K.D.B.J., et al.: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.69801412(2014) 11

    arXiv 2014

  4. [4]

    Comput- erized Medical Imaging and Graphics95, 102027 (2022) 1

    Ahmedt-Aristizabal, D., Armin, M.A., Denman, S., Fookes, C., Petersson, L.: A survey on graph-based deep learning for computational histopathology. Comput- erized Medical Imaging and Graphics95, 102027 (2022) 1

    2022

  5. [5]

    In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference

    Albastaki, S., Sohail, A., Ganapathi, I.I., Alawode, B., Khan, A., Javed, S., Werghi, N., Bennamoun, M., Mahmood, A.: Multi-resolution pathology-language pre-training model with text-guided visual representation. In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference. pp. 25907–25919 (2025) 1, 2, 4, 5, 12, 25, 30

    2025

  6. [6]

    Journal of Pathology Informatics p

    Ardon, O., Manzo, A., Spencer, J., Reuter, V.E., Hameed, M., Hanna, M.G.: Digital slide scanning at scale: Comparison of whole slide imaging devices in a clinical setting. Journal of Pathology Informatics p. 100446 (2025) 2

    2025

  7. [7]

    PloS one14(4), e0210706 (2019) 11, 44

    Arunachalam, H.B., Mishra, R., Daescu, O., Cederberg, K., Rakheja, D., Sen- gupta, A., Leonard, D., Hallac, R., Leavey, P.: Viable and necrotic tumor as- sessment from whole slide images of osteosarcoma using machine-learning and deep-learning models. PloS one14(4), e0210706 (2019) 11, 44

    2019

  8. [8]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.09723 (2022) 4, 12, 25

    Azizi, S., Culp, L., Freyberg, J., Mustafa, B., Baur, S., Kornblith, S., Chen, T., MacWilliams, P., Mahdavi, S.S., Wulczyn, E., et al.: Robust and efficient medical imaging with self-supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.09723 (2022) 4, 12, 25

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12966 (2023) 12

    Bai, J., Bai, S., Yang, S., Wang, S., Tan, S., Wang, P., Lin, J., Zhou, C., Zhou, J.: Qwen-vl: A versatile vision-language model for understanding, localization, text reading, and beyond. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12966 (2023) 12

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Pathology International73(3), 127–134 (2023) 2, 30, 31

    Baidoshvili, A., Khacheishvili, M., van der Laak, J.A., van Diest, P.J.: A whole- slide imaging based workflow reduces the reading time of pathologists. Pathology International73(3), 127–134 (2023) 2, 30, 31

    2023

  11. [11]

    IEEE transactions on medical imaging38(2), 550–560 (2018) 11, 47

    Bandi, P., Geessink, O., Manson, Q., Van Dijk, M., Balkenhol, M., Hermsen, M., Bejnordi, B.E., Lee, B., Paeng, K., Zhong, A., et al.: From detection of individual metastases to classification of lymph node status at the patient level: the came- lyon17 challenge. IEEE transactions on medical imaging38(2), 550–560 (2018) 11, 47

    2018

  12. [12]

    Bashashati, A., Farahani, H., Consortium, O., Karnezis, A., Akbari, A., Kim, S., Chow, A., Dane, S., Zhang, A., Asadi, M.: Ubc ovarian cancer subtype classification and outlier detection (ubc-ocean) (2023),https://kaggle.com/ competitions/UBC-OCEAN11, 47

    2023

  13. [13]

    Informatics in Medicine Unlocked19, 100341 (2020) 11, 45

    Bolhasani, H., Amjadi, E., Tabatabaeian, M., Jassbi, S.J.: A histopathological im- age dataset for grading breast invasive ductal carcinomas. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked19, 100341 (2020) 11, 45

    2020

  14. [14]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.12142v1 (2019),https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.12142 11, 44

    Borkowski, A.A., Bui, M.M., Thomas, L.B., Wilson, C.P., DeLand, L.A., Mas- torides, S.M.: Lung and colon cancer histopathological image dataset (lc25000). arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.12142v1 (2019),https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.12142 11, 44

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1912

  15. [15]

    Database2022, baac093 (2022) 11, 46 Multi-Resolution Pyramid Transformer 17

    Brancati, N., Anniciello, A.M., Pati, P., Riccio, D., Scognamiglio, G., Jaume, G., De Pietro, G., Di Bonito, M., Foncubierta, A., Botti, G., et al.: Bracs: A dataset for breast carcinoma subtyping in h&e histology images. Database2022, baac093 (2022) 11, 46 Multi-Resolution Pyramid Transformer 17

    2022

  16. [16]

    bioRxiv pp

    Brummer, O., Pölönen, P., Mustjoki, S., Brück, O.: Integrative analysis of his- tological textures and lymphocyte infiltration in renal cell carcinoma using deep learning. bioRxiv pp. 2022–08 (2022) 11, 44

    2022

  17. [17]

    Nature Medicine28, 154–163 (2022).https://doi.org/10

    Bulten, W., Kartasalo, K., Chen, P.H.C., Ström, P., Pinckaers, H., Nagpal, K., Cai, Y., Steiner, D.F., van Boven, H., Vink, R., Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, C., van der Laak, J., Amin, M.B., Evans, A.J., van der Kwast, T., Allan, R., Humphrey, P.A., Grönberg, H., Samaratunga, H., the PANDA challenge consor- tium: Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and gleaso...

    2022

  18. [18]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.17297 (2024) 26

    Cai, Z., Cao, M., Chen, H., Chen, K., Chen, K., Chen, X., Chen, X., Chen, Z., Chen, Z., Chu, P., et al.: Internlm2 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.17297 (2024) 26

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Advances in neural information processing systems33, 9912–9924 (2020) 4

    Caron, M., Misra, I., Mairal, J., Goyal, P., Bojanowski, P., Joulin, A.: Unsuper- vised learning of visual features by contrasting cluster assignments. Advances in neural information processing systems33, 9912–9924 (2020) 4

    2020

  20. [20]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Caron, M., Touvron, H., Misra, I., Jégou, H., Mairal, J., Bojanowski, P., Joulin, A.: Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 9650–9660 (2021) 11, 33, 35

    2021

  21. [21]

    Nature Biomedical Engineering6(12), 1420–1434 (2022) 2, 30

    Chen, C., Lu, M.Y., Williamson, D.F., Chen, T.Y., Schaumberg, A.J., Mahmood, F.:Fastandscalablesearchofwhole-slideimagesviaself-superviseddeeplearning. Nature Biomedical Engineering6(12), 1420–1434 (2022) 2, 30

    2022

  22. [22]

    In: In- ternational Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted In- tervention

    Chen, P., Li, H., Zhu, C., Zheng, S., Shui, Z., Yang, L.: Wsicaption: Multiple instance generation of pathology reports for gigapixel whole-slide images. In: In- ternational Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted In- tervention. pp. 546–556. Springer (2024) 12

    2024

  23. [23]

    Chen, P., Zhu, C., Zheng, S., Li, H., Yang, L.: Wsi-vqa: Interpreting whole slide imagesbygenerativevisualquestionanswering.In:EuropeanConferenceonCom- puter Vision. pp. 401–417. Springer (2025) 10, 36

    2025

  24. [24]

    Chen, P., Zhu, C., Zheng, S., Li, H., Yang, L.: Wsi-vqa: Interpreting whole slide imagesbygenerativevisualquestionanswering.In:EuropeanConferenceonCom- puter Vision (ECCV) 2024. pp. 401–417 (2025).https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-031-72764-1_23,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72764-1_2311, 47

    doi:10.1007/978- 2024

  25. [25]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Chen, R.J., Chen, C., Li, Y., Chen, T.Y., Trister, A.D., Krishnan, R.G., Mah- mood, F.: Scaling vision transformers to gigapixel images via hierarchical self- supervised learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 16144–16155 (2022) 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 11, 12, 13, 25, 26, 27, 30, 31, 32

    2022

  26. [26]

    Nature Medicine30(3), 850–862 (2024) 2, 4, 8, 12, 15, 25, 38, 39, 40, 46

    Chen, R.J., Ding, T., Lu, M.Y., Williamson, D.F., Jaume, G., Song, A.H., Chen, B., Zhang, A., Shao, D., Shaban, M., et al.: Towards a general-purpose foundation model for computational pathology. Nature Medicine30(3), 850–862 (2024) 2, 4, 8, 12, 15, 25, 38, 39, 40, 46

    2024

  27. [27]

    In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference

    Chen, Y., Wang, G., Ji, Y., Li, Y., Ye, J., Li, T., Hu, M., Yu, R., Qiao, Y., He, J.: Slidechat: A large vision-language assistant for whole-slide pathology image understanding. In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference. pp. 5134–5143 (2025) 3, 5, 10, 12, 25, 28, 33, 36

    2025

  28. [28]

    Alawode et al

    Chen, Y., Wang, G., Ji, Y., Li, Y., Ye, J., Li, T., Zhang, B., Pei, N., Yu, R., Qiao, Y., He, J.: Slidechat: A large vision-language assistant for whole-slide 18 B. Alawode et al. pathology image understanding. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 5134–5143 (June 2025), https://openaccess.thecvf...

    2025

  29. [29]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Chen, Y., Liu, H., Yin, H., Fan, B.: Building vision transformers with hierar- chy aware feature aggregation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 5908–5918 (2023) 28

    2023

  30. [30]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.08534 (2022) 28

    Chen,Z.,Duan,Y.,Wang,W.,He,J.,Lu,T.,Dai,J.,Qiao,Y.:Visiontransformer adapter for dense predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.08534 (2022) 28

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    See https://vicuna

    Chiang, W.L., Li, Z., Lin, Z., Sheng, Y., Wu, Z., Zhang, H., Zheng, L., Zhuang, S., Zhuang, Y., Gonzalez, J.E., et al.: Vicuna: An open-source chatbot impressing gpt-4 with 90%* chatgpt quality. See https://vicuna. lmsys. org (accessed 14 April 2023)2(3), 6 (2023) 26

    2023

  32. [32]

    Labo- ratory Investigation101(4), 412–422 (2021) 1

    Cui, M., Zhang, D.Y.: Artificial intelligence and computational pathology. Labo- ratory Investigation101(4), 412–422 (2021) 1

    2021

  33. [33]

    Medical Image Analysis80, 102485 (2022) 11, 43

    Da, Q., Huang, X., Li, Z., Zuo, Y., Zhang, C., Liu, J., Chen, W., Li, J., Xu, D., Hu, Z., et al.: Digestpath: A benchmark dataset with challenge review for the pathological detection and segmentation of digestive-system. Medical Image Analysis80, 102485 (2022) 11, 43

    2022

  34. [34]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19666 (2024) 3, 5, 12, 25, 31, 38, 39

    Ding, T., Wagner, S.J., Song, A.H., Chen, R.J., Lu, M.Y., Zhang, A., Vaidya, A.J., Jaume, G., Shaban, M., Kim, A., et al.: Multimodal whole slide foundation model for pathology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19666 (2024) 3, 5, 12, 25, 31, 38, 39

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04079 (2024) 4, 12, 25

    Dippel, J., Feulner, B., Winterhoff, T., Milbich, T., Tietz, S., Schallenberg, S., Dernbach, G., Kunft, A., Heinke, S., Eich, M.L., et al.: Rudolfv: a foundation model by pathologists for pathologists. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04079 (2024) 4, 12, 25

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    British journal of cancer124(4), 686–696 (2021) 1

    Echle, A., Rindtorff, N.T., Brinker, T.J., Luedde, T., Pearson, A.T., Kather, J.N.: Deep learningin cancerpathology: anew generation ofclinical biomarkers. British journal of cancer124(4), 686–696 (2021) 1

    2021

  37. [37]

    Edwards, N.J., Oberti, M., Thangudu, R.R., Cai, S., McGarvey, P.B., Jacob, S., Madhavan, S., Ketchum, K.A.: The cptac data portal: A resource for cancer proteomics research (2015).https://doi.org/10.1021/pr501254j,https:// pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/pr501254j3, 10, 11, 42, 46

    work page doi:10.1021/pr501254j 2015

  38. [38]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.09173 (2024) 12

    Filiot, A., Jacob, P., Mac Kain, A., Saillard, C.: Phikon-v2, a large and public fea- ture extractor for biomarker prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.09173 (2024) 12

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Journal of Pathology Informatics13, 100104 (2022) 2, 31, 36

    Ghezloo, F., Wang, P.C., Kerr, K.F., Brunyé, T.T., Drew, T., Chang, O.H., Reisch, L.M., Shapiro, L.G., Elmore, J.G.: An analysis of pathologists’ view- ing processes as they diagnose whole slide digital images. Journal of Pathology Informatics13, 100104 (2022) 2, 31, 36

    2022

  40. [40]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783 (2024) 26

    Grattafiori, A., Dubey, A., Jauhri, A., Pandey, A., Kadian, A., Al-Dahle, A., Letman, A., Mathur, A., Schelten, A., Vaughan, A., et al.: The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783 (2024) 26

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer- Assisted Intervention

    Guo, Z., Ma, J., Xu, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Chen, H.: Histgen: Histopathology report generation via local-global feature encoding and cross-modal context inter- action. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer- Assisted Intervention. pp. 189–199. Springer (2024) 11, 12, 47 Multi-Resolution Pyramid Transformer 19

    2024

  42. [42]

    In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference

    Guo, Z., Xiong, C., Ma, J., Sun, Q., Feng, L., Wang, J., Chen, H.: Focus: Knowledge-enhanced adaptive visual compression for few-shot whole slide image classification. In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference. pp. 15590–15600 (2025) 40

    2025

  43. [43]

    In: International Conference on Medi- cal Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention

    Guo, Z., Zhao, W., Wang, S., Yu, L.: Higt: Hierarchical interaction graph- transformer for whole slide image analysis. In: International Conference on Medi- cal Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. pp. 755–764. Springer (2023) 3, 4

    2023

  44. [44]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06455 (2022) 11, 43

    Han, C., Pan, X., Yan, L., Lin, H., Li, B., Yao, S., Lv, S., Shi, Z., Mai, J., Lin, J., et al.: Wsss4luad: Grand challenge on weakly-supervised tissue semantic segmentation for lung adenocarcinoma. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06455 (2022) 11, 43

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Advances in anatomic pathology27(4), 251–259 (2020) 2

    Hanna, M.G., Parwani, A., Sirintrapun, S.J.: Whole slide imaging: technology and applications. Advances in anatomic pathology27(4), 251–259 (2020) 2

    2020

  46. [46]

    Advances in anatomic pathology27(1), 20–26 (2020) 2

    Harada, S., Morlote, D.: Molecular pathology of colorectal cancer. Advances in anatomic pathology27(1), 20–26 (2020) 2

    2020

  47. [47]

    CoRR (2024) 12

    He, S., Nie, Y., Chen, Z., Cai, Z., Wang, H., Yang, S., Chen, H.: Meddr: Diagnosis- guided bootstrapping for large-scale medical vision-language learning. CoRR (2024) 12

    2024

  48. [48]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.10286 (2020), https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.1028611, 45

    He, X., Zhang, Y., Mou, L., Xing, E.P., Xie, P.: Pathvqa: 30000+ questions for medical visual question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.10286 (2020), https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.1028611, 45

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  49. [49]

    Medical Image Analysis94, 103143 (2024) 4

    Hörst, F., Rempe, M., Heine, L., Seibold, C., Keyl, J., Baldini, G., Ugurel, S., Siveke, J., Grünwald, B., Egger, J., et al.: Cellvit: Vision transformers for precise cell segmentation and classification. Medical Image Analysis94, 103143 (2024) 4

    2024

  50. [50]

    Journal of Pathology Informatics p

    Hosseini, M.S., Bejnordi, B.E., Trinh, V.Q.H., Chan, L., Hasan, D., Li, X., Yang, S., Kim, T., Zhang, H., Wu, T., et al.: Computational pathology: a survey review and the way forward. Journal of Pathology Informatics p. 100357 (2024) 1

    2024

  51. [51]

    Nature medicine29(9), 2307–2316 (2023) 4, 12, 25

    Huang, Z., Bianchi, F., Yuksekgonul, M., Montine, T.J., Zou, J.: A visual– language foundation model for pathology image analysis using medical twitter. Nature medicine29(9), 2307–2316 (2023) 4, 12, 25

    2023

  52. [52]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276 (2024) 12

    Hurst, A., Lerer, A., Goucher, A.P., Perelman, A., Ramesh, A., Clark, A., Ostrow, A., Welihinda, A., Hayes, A., Radford, A., et al.: Gpt-4o system card. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276 (2024) 12

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Cell173(2), 283–285 (2018) 3, 10, 11, 36, 37, 42, 46

    Hutter, C., Zenklusen, J.C.: The cancer genome atlas: creating lasting value be- yond its data. Cell173(2), 283–285 (2018) 3, 10, 11, 36, 37, 42, 46

    2018

  54. [54]

    2018 (2018) 11, 44

    ICIAR, B.: Grand challenge on breast cancer histology images. 2018 (2018) 11, 44

    2018

  55. [55]

    Advances in neural information processing systems36(2024) 2, 4, 10, 12, 25, 37, 38, 41

    Ikezogwo, W., Seyfioglu, S., Ghezloo, F., Geva, D., Sheikh Mohammed, F., Anand, P.K., Krishna, R., Shapiro, L.: Quilt-1m: One million image-text pairs for histopathology. Advances in neural information processing systems36(2024) 2, 4, 10, 12, 25, 37, 38, 41

    2024

  56. [56]

    In: International conference on machine learning

    Ilse, M., Tomczak, J., Welling, M.: Attention-based deep multiple instance learn- ing. In: International conference on machine learning. pp. 2127–2136. PMLR (2018) 13, 15, 39, 40

    2018

  57. [57]

    International journal of surgical pathology32(3), 433–448 (2024) 2

    Jain, E., Patel, A., Parwani, A.V., Shafi, S., Brar, Z., Sharma, S., Mohanty, S.K.: Whole slide imaging technology and its applications: Current and emerging per- spectives. International journal of surgical pathology32(3), 433–448 (2024) 2

    2024

  58. [58]

    Alawode et al

    Javed, S., Mahmood, A., Ganapathi, I.I., Dharejo, F.A., Werghi, N., Bennamoun, M.: Cplip: Zero-shot learning for histopathology with comprehensive vision- 20 B. Alawode et al. language alignment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 11450–11459 (2024) 4, 12, 25

    2024

  59. [59]

    In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Con- ference

    Jiang, Y., Kwan, H.M., Peng, T., Gao, G., Zhang, F., Zhu, X., Sole, J., Bull, D.: Hiif: Hierarchical encoding based implicit image function for continuous super- resolution. In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Con- ference. pp. 2289–2299 (2025) 28

    2025

  60. [60]

    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (2024) 3, 4

    Jin, C., Luo, L., Lin, H., Hou, J., Chen, H.: Hmil: Hierarchical multi-instance learning for fine-grained whole slide image classification. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (2024) 3, 4

    2024

  61. [61]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Kang, M., Song, H., Park, S., Yoo, D., Pereira, S.: Benchmarking self-supervised learning on diverse pathology datasets. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 3344–3354 (2023) 4, 12

    2023

  62. [62]

    Bmj374 (2021) 31

    Kanth, P., Inadomi, J.M.: Screening and prevention of colorectal cancer. Bmj374 (2021) 31

    2021

  63. [63]

    1214456,https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.121445611, 44

    Kather, J.N., Halama, N., Marx, A.: 100,000 histological images of human col- orectal cancer and healthy tissue (2018).https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 1214456,https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.121445611, 44

    doi:10.5281/zenodo 2018

  64. [64]

    Frontiers in Oncology12, 1022967 (2022) 11, 44

    Kriegsmann, K., Lobers, F., Zgorzelski, C., Kriegsmann, J., Janssen, C., Meliss, R.R., Muley, T., Sack, U., Steinbuss, G., Kriegsmann, M.: Deep learning for the detection of anatomical tissue structures and neoplasms of the skin on scanned histopathological tissue sections. Frontiers in Oncology12, 1022967 (2022) 11, 44

    2022

  65. [65]

    Nature medicine27(5), 775–784 (2021) 1

    Van der Laak, J., Litjens, G., Ciompi, F.: Deep learning in histopathology: the path to the clinic. Nature medicine27(5), 775–784 (2021) 1

    2021

  66. [66]

    Gastroenterology158(2), 418–432 (2020) 31

    Ladabaum, U., Dominitz, J.A., Kahi, C., Schoen, R.E.: Strategies for colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterology158(2), 418–432 (2020) 31

    2020

  67. [67]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 28541–28564 (2023) 12

    Li, C., Wong, C., Zhang, S., Usuyama, N., Liu, H., Yang, J., Naumann, T., Poon, H., Gao, J.: Llava-med: Training a large language-and-vision assistant for biomedicine in one day. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 28541–28564 (2023) 12

    2023

  68. [68]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Li, J., Chen, Y., Chu, H., Sun, Q., Guan, T., Han, A., He, Y.: Dynamic graph representation with knowledge-aware attention for histopathology whole slide im- age analysis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 11323–11332 (2024) 40

    2024

  69. [70]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.02141 (2024),https: //arxiv.org/abs/2412.0214111, 47

    Liang, Y., Lyu, X., Ding, M., Chen, W., Zhang, J., Ren, Y., He, X., Wu, S., Yang, S., Wang, X., Xing, X., Shen, L.: Wsi-llava: A multimodal large language model for whole slide image. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.02141 (2024),https: //arxiv.org/abs/2412.0214111, 47

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  70. [71]

    JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute116(10), 1612–1620 (2024) 31

    Nascimento de Lima, P., Van Den Puttelaar, R., Knudsen, A.B., Hahn, A.I., Kuntz, K.M., Ozik, J., Collier, N., Alarid-Escudero, F., Zauber, A.G., Inadomi, J.M., et al.: Characteristics of a cost-effective blood test for colorectal cancer screening. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute116(10), 1612–1620 (2024) 31

    2024

  71. [72]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Liu,H.,Li,C.,Li,Y.,Lee,Y.J.:Improvedbaselineswithvisualinstructiontuning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 26296–26306 (2024) 12 Multi-Resolution Pyramid Transformer 21

    2024

  72. [73]

    Advances in neural information processing systems36, 34892–34916 (2023) 3

    Liu, H., Li, C., Wu, Q., Lee, Y.J.: Visual instruction tuning. Advances in neural information processing systems36, 34892–34916 (2023) 3

    2023

  73. [74]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., Guo, B.: Swin trans- former: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 10012–10022 (2021) 28

    2021

  74. [75]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03983 (2016) 11

    Loshchilov, I., Hutter, F.: Sgdr: Stochastic gradient descent with warm restarts. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03983 (2016) 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  75. [76]

    Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine140(1), 41–50 (2016) 1

    Louis, D.N., Feldman, M., Carter, A.B., Dighe, A.S., Pfeifer, J.D., Bry, L., Almeida, J.S., Saltz, J., Braun, J., Tomaszewski, J.E., et al.: Computational pathology: a path ahead. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine140(1), 41–50 (2016) 1

    2016

  76. [77]

    Nature Medicine30(3), 863–874 (2024) 2, 4, 12, 25, 38, 40, 41

    Lu, M.Y., Chen, B., Williamson, D.F., Chen, R.J., Liang, I., Ding, T., Jaume, G., Odintsov, I., Le, L.P., Gerber, G., et al.: A visual-language foundation model for computational pathology. Nature Medicine30(3), 863–874 (2024) 2, 4, 12, 25, 38, 40, 41

    2024

  77. [78]

    Nature pp

    Lu, M.Y., Chen, B., Williamson, D.F., Chen, R.J., Zhao, M., Chow, A.K., Ike- mura, K., Kim, A., Pouli, D., Patel, A., et al.: A multimodal generative ai copilot for human pathology. Nature pp. 1–3 (2024) 5, 36

    2024

  78. [79]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Lu, M.Y., Chen, B., Zhang, A., Williamson, D.F., Chen, R.J., Ding, T., Le, L.P., Chuang, Y.S., Mahmood, F.: Visual language pretrained multiple instance zero- shot transfer for histopathology images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 19764–19775 (2023) 4, 12, 46

    2023

  79. [80]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

    Lu, W., Graham, S., Bilal, M., Rajpoot, N., Minhas, F.: Capturing cellular topol- ogy in multi-gigapixel pathology images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. pp. 260–261 (2020) 2

    2020

  80. [81]

    geneva, switzerland: World health orga- nization, international agency for research on cancer, who press, 2015

    McGuire, S.: World cancer report 2014. geneva, switzerland: World health orga- nization, international agency for research on cancer, who press, 2015. Advances in nutrition7(2), 418 (2016) 1

    2014

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.