Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Implications of W-boson mass anomaly for atomic parity violation

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 25 Apr 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This brings existing experimental result for $Q_W({}^{133}{\rm Cs})$ into an essential agreement with the Standard Model.

how it is stated · asserted 0.98 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2204.11991 (version 3)
Pith IDMQVEFBLO, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. Derevianko, H. B. Tran Tan. "Implications of W-boson mass anomaly for atomic parity violation." arXiv:2204.11991 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/MQVEFBLO
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,746 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.15 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.93 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We consider the implication of the recent measurement of the W-boson mass $M_W$ [Science 376, 170 (2022)] for atomic parity violation experiments. We show that the change in $M_W$ shifts the Standard Model prediction for the ${}^{133}$Cs nuclear weak charge to $Q_W({}^{133}{\rm Cs})=-72.85(6)$, i.e. by $5.5\sigma$ from its current value. This brings existing experimental result for $Q_W({}^{133}{\rm Cs})$ into an essential agreement with the Standard Model. Using our revised value for $Q_W({}^{133}{\rm Cs})$, we readjust constraints on physics beyond the Standard Model.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We consider the implication of the recent measurement of the W-boson mass $M_W$ [Science 376, 170 (2022)] for atomic parity violation experiments. contribution 0.57 0.28 0.04 unclear 0.75
s1 We show that the change in $M_W$ shifts the Standard Model prediction for the ${}^{133}$Cs nuclear weak charge to $Q_W({}^{133}{\rm Cs})=-72.85(6)$, i.e. by $5.5\sigma$ from its current value. result 1.00 0.90 0.38 asserted 1.00
s2 This brings existing experimental result for $Q_W({}^{133}{\rm Cs})$ into an essential agreement with the Standard Model. interpretation 0.95 0.58 0.60 asserted 0.98
s3 Using our revised value for $Q_W({}^{133}{\rm Cs})$, we readjust constraints on physics beyond the Standard Model. contribution 0.78 0.90 0.11 asserted 0.95

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.96 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.68.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We consider the implication of the recent measurement of the W-boson mass $M_W$ [Science 376, 170 (2022)] for atomic parity violation experiments. We show that the change in $M_W$ shifts the Standard Model prediction for the ${}^{133}$Cs nuclear weak charge to $Q_W({}^{133}{\rm Cs})=-72.85(6)$, i.e. by $5.5\sigma$ from its current value. This brings existing experimental result for $Q_W({}^{133}{\rm Cs})$ into an essential agreement with the Standard Model. Using our revised value for $Q_W({}^{133}{\rm Cs})$, we readjust constraints on physics beyond the Standard Model.

Human review
How the literature uses it

7 arXiv papers cite this in 7 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 4 papers

What it cites · 2 sentences without a confident label

Uses data or values from 1 paper
Compares with 4 papers
Cites as background 11 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.