Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Toward Policy Explanations for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.12568 v4 pith:SH4QDD5E submitted 2022-04-26 cs.AI cs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords explanationsmulti-agentuseragentlearningmarlpolicyreinforcement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Advances in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) enable sequential decision making for a range of exciting multi-agent applications such as cooperative AI and autonomous driving. Explaining agent decisions is crucial for improving system transparency, increasing user satisfaction, and facilitating human-agent collaboration. However, existing works on explainable reinforcement learning mostly focus on the single-agent setting and are not suitable for addressing challenges posed by multi-agent environments. We present novel methods to generate two types of policy explanations for MARL: (i) policy summarization about the agent cooperation and task sequence, and (ii) language explanations to answer queries about agent behavior. Experimental results on three MARL domains demonstrate the scalability of our methods. A user study shows that the generated explanations significantly improve user performance and increase subjective ratings on metrics such as user satisfaction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Decoding OTC Government Bond Market Liquidity: An ABM Model for Market Dynamics

    q-fin.TR 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A Sugarscape-style ABM of OTC government bond markets reports that market-maker diversity and lower costs increase simulated liquidity and stability, but the model is only validated against one calibrated aggregate statistic.

Pith tools