Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Boosting Video Object Segmentation based on Scale Inconsistency

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · Submitted 2 May 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Experiments on DAVIS 16 and DAVIS 17 datasets show that our framework can be generically applied to various VOS models and improve their performance.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2205.01197 (version 1)
Pith ID47756QNK, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationChangjae Oh, Hengyi Wang. "Boosting Video Object Segmentation based on Scale Inconsistency." arXiv:2205.01197 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/47756QNK
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,944 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.35 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.42 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present a refinement framework to boost the performance of pre-trained semi-supervised video object segmentation (VOS) models. Our work is based on scale inconsistency, which is motivated by the observation that existing VOS models generate inconsistent predictions from input frames with different sizes. We use the scale inconsistency as a clue to devise a pixel-level attention module that aggregates the advantages of the predictions from different-size inputs. The scale inconsistency is also used to regularize the training based on a pixel-level variance measured by an uncertainty estimation. We further present a self-supervised online adaptation, tailored for test-time optimization, that bootstraps the predictions without ground-truth masks based on the scale inconsistency. Experiments on DAVIS 16 and DAVIS 17 datasets show that our framework can be generically applied to various VOS models and improve their performance.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present a refinement framework to boost the performance of pre-trained semi-supervised video object segmentation (VOS) models. contribution 1.00 0.92 0.16 asserted 0.99
s1 Our work is based on scale inconsistency, which is motivated by the observation that existing VOS models generate inconsistent predictions from input frames with different sizes. contribution 0.39 0.25 0.06 asserted 0.99
s2 We use the scale inconsistency as a clue to devise a pixel-level attention module that aggregates the advantages of the predictions from different-size inputs. method 0.95 0.94 0.05 asserted 1.00
s3 The scale inconsistency is also used to regularize the training based on a pixel-level variance measured by an uncertainty estimation. method 0.93 0.92 0.04 asserted 1.00
s4 We further present a self-supervised online adaptation, tailored for test-time optimization, that bootstraps the predictions without ground-truth masks based on the scale inconsistency. contribution 0.55 0.95 0.05 asserted 1.00
s5 Experiments on DAVIS 16 and DAVIS 17 datasets show that our framework can be generically applied to various VOS models and improve their performance. result 0.99 0.96 0.76 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present a refinement framework to boost the performance of pre-trained semi-supervised video object segmentation (VOS) models. Our work is based on scale inconsistency, which is motivated by the observation that existing VOS models generate inconsistent predictions from input frames with different sizes. We use the scale inconsistency as a clue to devise a pixel-level attention module that aggregates the advantages of the predictions from different-size inputs. The scale inconsistency is also used to regularize the training based on a pixel-level variance measured by an uncertainty estimation. We further present a self-supervised online adaptation, tailored for test-time optimization, that bootstraps the predictions without ground-truth masks based on the scale inconsistency. Experiments on DAVIS 16 and DAVIS 17 datasets show that our framework can be generically applied to various VOS models and improve their performance.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 2 sentences without a confident label

Uses data or values from 1 paper
Compares with 1 paper
  • By employing the proposed method, OSVOS can outperform all existing online learning-based methods on DAVIS 16 without any post-processing that is widely adopted in existing methods [ref] .

    Make One-Shot Video Object Segmentation Efficient Again · Evaluation and Comparison · 0.98

Cites as support 1 paper
  • However, as demonstrated by the works in image segmentation [ref] , simply averaging the predictions cannot effectively handle the scale inconsistency as the magnitude of inconsistency differs from pixel to pixel.

    Hierarchical Multi-Scale Attention for Semantic Segmentation · Multi-scale Context Aggregation Module · 0.97

Cites as background 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.