REVIEW
A Manifold Two-Sample Test Study: Integral Probability Metric with Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Two-sample tests are important areas aiming to determine whether two collections of observations follow the same distribution or not. We propose two-sample tests based on integral probability metric (IPM) for high-dimensional samples supported on a low-dimensional manifold. We characterize the properties of proposed tests with respect to the number of samples $n$ and the structure of the manifold with intrinsic dimension $d$. When an atlas is given, we propose two-step test to identify the difference between general distributions, which achieves the type-II risk in the order of $n^{-1/\max\{d,2\}}$. When an atlas is not given, we propose H\"older IPM test that applies for data distributions with $(s,\beta)$-H\"older densities, which achieves the type-II risk in the order of $n^{-(s+\beta)/d}$. To mitigate the heavy computation burden of evaluating the H\"older IPM, we approximate the H\"older function class using neural networks. Based on the approximation theory of neural networks, we show that the neural network IPM test has the type-II risk in the order of $n^{-(s+\beta)/d}$, which is in the same order of the type-II risk as the H\"older IPM test. Our proposed tests are adaptive to low-dimensional geometric structure because their performance crucially depends on the intrinsic dimension instead of the data dimension.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.