Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Results of the NeurIPS'21 Challenge on Billion-Scale Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.03763 v1 pith:HWBPNKDY submitted 2022-05-08 cs.LG cs.DBcs.DScs.PF

classification cs.LGcs.DBcs.DScs.PF
keywords hardwarealgorithmstrackbillion-scalecompetitionbaselinecitepleaderboards
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the broad range of algorithms for Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search, most empirical evaluations of algorithms have focused on smaller datasets, typically of 1 million points~\citep{Benchmark}. However, deploying recent advances in embedding based techniques for search, recommendation and ranking at scale require ANNS indices at billion, trillion or larger scale. Barring a few recent papers, there is limited consensus on which algorithms are effective at this scale vis-\`a-vis their hardware cost. This competition compares ANNS algorithms at billion-scale by hardware cost, accuracy and performance. We set up an open source evaluation framework and leaderboards for both standardized and specialized hardware. The competition involves three tracks. The standard hardware track T1 evaluates algorithms on an Azure VM with limited DRAM, often the bottleneck in serving billion-scale indices, where the embedding data can be hundreds of GigaBytes in size. It uses FAISS~\citep{Faiss17} as the baseline. The standard hardware track T2 additional allows inexpensive SSDs in addition to the limited DRAM and uses DiskANN~\citep{DiskANN19} as the baseline. The specialized hardware track T3 allows any hardware configuration, and again uses FAISS as the baseline. We compiled six diverse billion-scale datasets, four newly released for this competition, that span a variety of modalities, data types, dimensions, deep learning models, distance functions and sources. The outcome of the competition was ranked leaderboards of algorithms in each track based on recall at a query throughput threshold. Additionally, for track T3, separate leaderboards were created based on recall as well as cost-normalized and power-normalized query throughput.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GPU-Accelerated ANNS: Quantized for Speed, Built for Change

    cs.DB 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Jasper, a GPU-native Vamana ANNS system, combines batch-parallel construction, RaBitQ quantization, and an optimized beam-search kernel to deliver reported throughput up to ~1.9x CAGRA with streaming updates.

  2. Graph-Based Vector Search: An Experimental Evaluation of the State-of-the-Art

    cs.IR 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An evaluation of twelve graph-based vector search methods on up to one billion vectors shows that incremental insertion and neighborhood diversification are the design choices that scale best.

  3. Toward Efficient and Scalable Design of In-Memory Graph-Based Vector Search

    cs.IR 2025-09 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    In head-to-head tests on up to one billion vectors, graph-based vector search methods that use incremental insertion and neighborhood diversification (especially RND and MOND) beat propagation- and most divide-and-con...

Pith tools