Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The complexity of geometric scaling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.04063 v2 pith:6KUELTST submitted 2022-05-09 math.OC math.MG

The complexity of geometric scaling

classification math.OC math.MG
keywords inftyaugmentationgeometricmathbbpolytopescalingschulzupper
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Geometric scaling, introduced by Schulz and Weismantel in 2002, solves the integer optimization problem $\max \{c\mathord{\cdot}x: x \in P \cap \mathbb Z^n\}$ by means of primal augmentations, where $P \subset \mathbb R^n$ is a polytope. We restrict ourselves to the important case when $P$ is a $0/1$-polytope. Schulz and Weismantel showed that no more than $O(n \log n \|c\|_\infty)$ calls to an augmentation oracle are required. This upper bound can be improved to $O(n \log \|c\|_\infty)$ using the early-stopping policy proposed in 2018 by Le Bodic, Pavelka, Pfetsch, and Pokutta. Considering both the maximum ratio augmentation variant of the method as well as its approximate version, we show that these upper bounds are essentially tight by maximizing over a $n$-dimensional simplex with vectors $c$ such that $\|c\|_\infty$ is either $n$ or $2^n$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.