Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Impala: Low-Latency, Communication-Efficient Private Deep Learning Inference

Cryptography and Security · Submitted 13 May 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Compared to the state-of-the-art, these optimizations provide a bandwidth savings of over 3X and speedup of 4X for private deep learning inference.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2205.06437 (version 1)
Pith IDCNXTW3TR, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBrandon Reagen, David Brooks, Gu-Yeon Wei, Woo-Seok Choi. "Impala: Low-Latency, Communication-Efficient Private Deep Learning Inference." arXiv:2205.06437 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/CNXTW3TR
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,135 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.58 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.59 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

This paper proposes Impala, a new cryptographic protocol for private inference in the client-cloud setting. Impala builds upon recent solutions that combine the complementary strengths of homomorphic encryption (HE) and secure multi-party computation (MPC). A series of protocol optimizations are developed to reduce both communication and performance bottlenecks. First, we remove MPC's overwhelmingly high communication cost from the client by introducing a proxy server and developing a low-overhead key switching technique. Key switching reduces the clients bandwidth by multiple orders of magnitude, however the communication between the proxy and cloud is still excessive. Second, to we develop an optimized garbled circuit that leverages truncated secret shares for faster evaluation and less proxy-cloud communication. Finally, we propose sparse HE convolution to reduce the computational bottleneck of using HE. Compared to the state-of-the-art, these optimizations provide a bandwidth savings of over 3X and speedup of 4X for private deep learning inference.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 This paper proposes Impala, a new cryptographic protocol for private inference in the client-cloud setting. contribution 1.00 0.83 0.12 asserted 1.00
s1 Impala builds upon recent solutions that combine the complementary strengths of homomorphic encryption (HE) and secure multi-party computation (MPC). background 0.76 0.21 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 A series of protocol optimizations are developed to reduce both communication and performance bottlenecks. contribution 0.83 0.89 0.07 asserted 0.99
s3 First, we remove MPC's overwhelmingly high communication cost from the client by introducing a proxy server and developing a low-overhead key switching technique. method 0.77 0.93 0.04 asserted 1.00
s4 Key switching reduces the clients bandwidth by multiple orders of magnitude, however the communication between the proxy and cloud is still excessive. limitation 0.78 0.81 0.04 asserted 1.00
s5 Second, to we develop an optimized garbled circuit that leverages truncated secret shares for faster evaluation and less proxy-cloud communication. method 0.65 0.93 0.04 asserted 1.00
s6 Finally, we propose sparse HE convolution to reduce the computational bottleneck of using HE. method 0.61 0.92 0.05 asserted 0.99
s7 Compared to the state-of-the-art, these optimizations provide a bandwidth savings of over 3X and speedup of 4X for private deep learning inference. result 1.00 0.92 0.79 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.39.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

This paper proposes Impala, a new cryptographic protocol for private inference in the client-cloud setting. Impala builds upon recent solutions that combine the complementary strengths of homomorphic encryption (HE) and secure multi-party computation (MPC). A series of protocol optimizations are developed to reduce both communication and performance bottlenecks. First, we remove MPC's overwhelmingly high communication cost from the client by introducing a proxy server and developing a low-overhead key switching technique. Key switching reduces the clients bandwidth by multiple orders of magnitude, however the communication between the proxy and cloud is still excessive. Second, to we develop an optimized garbled circuit that leverages truncated secret shares for faster evaluation and less proxy-cloud communication. Finally, we propose sparse HE convolution to reduce the computational bottleneck of using HE. Compared to the state-of-the-art, these optimizations provide a bandwidth savings of over 3X and speedup of 4X for private deep learning inference.

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 14 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 10 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 18 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 3 papers
Cites as background 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.